Analysis of Glass by X-Ray Fluorescence

ARL OPTIM’X WD-XRF Spectrometer

Topics Covered

Introduction
Instrumentation
Calibration and Limits of Detection
Conclusion
About Thermo Fisher Scientific-Elemental Analysis

Introduction

The simplest form of glass is the single component fused silica (SiO2). However it is both difficult to process and expensive. To reduce these difficulties, some other oxides are added imparting specific properties to the resultant glass. Most of glasses are composed of about 70 % silica, which is a glass former, soda as a flux in the form of carbonate and sulfate (about 14 %), and lime as a stabilizer in the form of limestone (about 10 %). Other types of oxides like alumina or magnesia improve the physical characteristics of glass, particularly the resistance to atmospheric conditions.

In-depth coloring is obtained by incorporation of various metallic oxides: oxides of chromium, iron, manganese or copper.

Instrumentation

An ARL OPTIM’X XRF spectrometer from Thermo Electron Corporation has been used to derive limits of detection and precision for the analysis of glasses. The ARL OPTIM’X is a wavelength dispersive system which
provides superior resolution and light elements capability. It is fitted with an Air-cooled Rh End-Window Tube with thin Be window (0.075 mm) and has a maximum power of 50 Watts. Thanks to close coupling between the X-ray tube anode and the sample the performance of the ARL OPTIM’X is equivalent to a 200W conventional WD-XRF instrument. The instrument can be equipped with the unique SmartGonio™, a series of Multichromators™ or both. Table 1 shows limits of detection for various elements in soda-lime glasses prepared as pressed powders.

Calibration and Limits of Detection

A series of pressed glass samples have been measured on an ARL OPTIM’X. Calibration curves have been derived by relating intensities for each oxide (or element) to concentrations in the standard samples. X-ray fluorescence measures elements, but the results can be related directly to the oxide forms of these elements when only one single form is present in the sample. Using the calibration curves, limits of detection have been derived using the SmartGonio for the most common oxides/elements found in soda-lime glasses (Table 1).

Table 1: Limits of Detection, using SmartGonio

Oxide/Element Line Crystal Detector LOD (ppm)
Na2O Kα1,2 AX-06 FPC 100
MgO Kα1,2 AX-06 FPC 60
Al2O3 Kα1,2 PET FPC 47
SiO2 Kα1,2 PET FPC N.R.
P2O5 Kα1,2 PET FPC 48
SO3 Kα1,2 PET FPC 23
Cl Kα1,2 PET FPC 24
K2O α1,2 LiF 200 FPC 14
CaO Kα1,2 LiF 200 FPC 12
TiO2 Kα1,2 LiF 200 FPC 12
Cr2O3 Kα1,2 LiF 200 FPC 9
MnO Kα1,2 LiF 200 FPC 9
Fe2O3 Kα1,2 LiF 200 FPC 9
ZnO Kα1,2 LiF 200 SC 3.6
SrO Kα1,2 LiF 200 SC 2.4
ZrO2 Kα1,2 LiF 200 SC 1.8
BaO Lα1 LiF 200 FPC 51
PbO Lα1 LiF 200 SC 9

Precision Tests

Precision tests have been carried out by analyzing repeatedly the same pressed pellet sample for eleven consecutive analyses. Eighteen elements/oxides are determined using a counting time of 36 seconds per analytical line. The results are summarized below for two different glass samples (Tables 2 and 3). In the case when precision should be improved for some elements this counting time could be increased. Doubling the counting time would improve the precision by a factor of about 1.4 (square root of 2).

Table 2: Precision Tests - Glass Sample A

RUN Na2O
%
MgO
%
Al2O3
%
SiO2
%
K2O
%
CaO
%
Fe2O3
%
SO3
ppm
TiO2
ppm
Time (s) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
Run 1 13.98 0.185 1.79 72.59 0.588 10.85 0.330 582 579
Run 2 13.93 0.193 1.81 72.60 0.582 10.82 0.333 640 563
Run 3 13.97 0.177 1.80 72.64 0.588 10.82 0.330 608 563
Run 4 14.01 0.178 1.80 72.64 0.582 10.87 0.330 645 581
Run 5 13.95 0.182 1.80 72.60 0.588 10.83 0.329 576 564
Run 6 13.94 0.177 1.81 72.61 0.589 10.82 0.329 573 569
Run 7 13.86 0.185 1.80 72.64 0.588 10.83 0.330 658 569
Run 8 13.92 0.186 1.81 72.59 0.585 10.84 0.331 652 566
Run 9 13.94 0.184 1.81 72.63 0.591 10.82 0.334 651 579
Run 10 13.98 0.183 1.80 72.63 0.586 10.87 0.332 617 526
Run 11 13.95 0.188 1.78 72.62 0.588 10.83 0.330 619 561
Avg. 13.95 0.183 1.80 72.62 0.587 10.84 0.331 620 565
Std.Dev. 0.04 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.003 0.02 0.0015 32 15

 

RUN P2O5
ppm
Cl
ppm
Cr2O3
ppm
MnO
ppm
As2O3
ppm
SrO
ppm
ZrO2
ppm
BaO
ppm
PbO
ppm
Time (s) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
Run 1 166.9 113.4 93.6 48.4 101.6 127.4 209.1 454.3 228.2
Run 2 146.3 129.5 91.4 44.7 101.5 124.8 204.6 392.6 218.9
Run 3 193.3 111.2 91.1 43.8 95.9 127.1 207.0 361.8 197.8
Run 4 199.2 104.6 96.2 29.9 103.8 127.0 205.4 375.7 234.6
Run 5 158.1 111.8 94.6 41.8 103.7 122.7 204.7 385.2 228.5
Run 6 171.3 107.9 85.2 49.5 95.0 126.3 203.8 355.4 194.8
Run 7 203.6 113.4 88.9 40.3 96.0 125.0 205.4 434.1 234.4
Run 8 190.4 135.6 94.5 44.7 96.8 125.9 203.4 315.1 207.3
Run 9 150.7 110.1 88.6 43.1 114.9 127.1 206.6 401.2 220.8
Run 10 255.0 104.0 83.6 41.9 99.2 125.8 206.2 402.2 214.6
Run 11 218.3 97.9 80.6 38.9 97.7 126.8 203.1 429.8 197.8
Avg. 186.6 112.7 89.9 42.4 100.5 126.0 205.4 391.6 216.1
Std.Dev. 32.5 11 5 5.2 5.7 1.4 1.8 39.7 15

Table 3: Precision Tests - Glass Sample B

RUN Na2O
%
MgO
%
Al2O3
%
SiO2
%
K2O
%
CaO
%
Fe2O3
%
SO3
ppm
TiO2
ppm
Time (s) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
Run 1 13.35 0.180 1.67 73.07 0.556 10.77 773.3 0.177 556.0
Run 2 13.33 0.180 1.68 73.08 0.564 10.76 757.9 0.181 568.0
Run 3 13.28 0.186 1.67 73.08 0.554 10.81 789.6 0.180 555.1
Run 4 13.28 0.185 1.66 73.11 0.559 10.83 768.2 0.186 587.2
Run 5 13.35 0.181 1.67 73.05 0.554 10.79 763.9 0.181 594.7
Run 6 13.32 0.172 1.67 73.11 0.566 10.80 767.3 0.186 541.4
Run 7 13.33 0.185 1.67 73.06 0.554 10.79 758.9 0.180 570.3
Run 8 13.26 0.185 1.69 73.04 0.555 10.78 771.7 0.185 565.2
Run 9 13.33 0.180 1.64 73.11 0.561 10.82 775.7 0.183 553.7
Run 10 13.30 0.193 1.68 73.08 0.556 10.80 764.1 0.188 572.6
Run 11 13.31 0.184 1.66 73.06 0.561 10.78 785.3 0.186 566.0
Avg. 13.31 0.183 1.67 73.08 0.558 10.80 770.5 0.183 566.4
Std.Dev. 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.004 0.02 10 0.003 15

 

RUN Na2O
%
MgO
%
Al2O3
%
SiO2
%
K2O
%
CaO
%
Fe2O3
%
SO3
ppm
TiO2
ppm
Time (s) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
Run 1 200.6 100.7 63.4 9.3 118.2 122.4 227.2 883.9 895.6
Run 2 159.5 111.2 65.9 3.9 112.0 122.2 226.1 960.6 914.5
Run 3 193.3 115.7 64.7 18.2 115.6 119.3 225.3 925.4 911.5
Run 4 156.6 103.5 74.7 8.7 105.6 126.5 225.1 891.3 900.0
Run 5 187.4 97.9 63.6 12.3 106.8 126.3 226.2 948.8 904.8
Run 6 183.0 114.6 59.5 14.7 115.2 125.5 226.3 960.5 904.6
Run 7 193.3 101.8 67.9 6.1 113.5 124.9 226.9 960.6 910.1
Run 8 191.8 95.2 66.9 9.3 101.6 124.7 227.4 918.0 919.7
Run 9 219.7 113.4 61.5 9.3 109.6 124.6 222.9 916.9 913.4
Run 10 243.2 101.3 64.4 1.0 103.4 123.0 226.0 980.8 912.7
Run 11 191.8 109.0 70.8 13.8 106.9 122.1 227.7 950.9 875.6
Avg. 192.8 105.8 65.8 9.7 109.9 123.8 226.1 936.2 905.7
Std.Dev. 24.2 7.2 4.3 4.9 5.4 2.2 1.4 31.2 12

Conclusion

All limits of detection obtained show that the ARL OPTIM’X can deliver adequate analysis results, notably for bottle glass application. Repeatability of analysis is excellent for major and minor elements even for Na2O and MgO. Longer counting time may be used in case elements present below 100 ppm need to be controlled precisely. These results show that the ARL OPTIM’X spectrometer is well suited to produce precision results for the determination of the main oxides and the coloring agents in glasses.

About Thermo Fisher Scientific-Elemental Analysis

For over 75 years, Thermo Fisher Scientific has been a worldwide supplier of spectrochemical instrumentation to major industries including steel, transportation, cement, construction, food, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, academic research, petroleum and electronics. They offer unsurpassed capabilities in the areas of optical emission (OE), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and automation of spectrometers.

This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific- Elemental Analysis.

For more information on this source, please visit Thermo Fisher Scientific- Elemental Analysis.

Date Added: May 16, 2012 | Updated: Jun 11, 2013
Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit