Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview

Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview

Image Credit: VUV Analytics

After VUV Analytics published methods for the certification of both gasoline (ASTM D8071) and jet fuel (ASTM D8267), the next natural step was to diesel, where we find a lot of the same test method players as in jet fuel testing: FIA (D1319), SFC (D5186), and HPLC (D6591). We’re all aware of the problems with D1319, and many people in the industry are ready to phase it out completely. SFC and HPLC are both solid methodologies for aromatics determination, but they falter with biodiesel-spiked diesel fuels. With the industry looking to enhance more environmentally friendly initiatives, the need to not only analyze samples containing biodiesel, but also to analyze and characterize the biodiesel itself is quickly becoming a priority.

From D8267 we know we can already analyze aromatics as well or better than the other methodologies, and we’ve also done substantial work into characterizing fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) in both food and pure biodiesel. Our goal with this diesel method is to maintain the same speed, accuracy, and precision from D8267 while offering what no other method can: the ability to characterize and quantitate the FAME content of added biodiesel.

The basis for this method uses the analysis conditions for D8267, but because diesel covers a higher carbon range than jet fuel, the final oven temperature is held for an additional 11 minutes (for a total run time of 25 minutes), and the spectra library is extended out to C30. However, the analysis is essentially the same as D8267: the VUV absorbance spectra for saturates, mono-aromatics, di-aromatics, and tri(+)-aromatics are distinct from one another, allowing for reliable spectral matching even when dozens of analytes are co-eluting.

Figure 1 shows the results of a diesel analysis via VUV Analyze™ Software. Using Time Interval Deconvolution™ to match and quantitate the measured absorbance spectra, total mass and volume percent can be determined for saturates (total) and aromatics (mono-, di-, tri(+)-, and total). This method compares well with the other methodologies, notably SFC and HPLC, as seen in Figure 2.

Additionally, samples that contain spikes of biodiesel in the 2 - 20% volume range can be analyzed with this method to determine not only saturates and aromatics but also total fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) content (Figure 1E). A preliminary precision study for FAME quantitation was performed on a 5% biodiesel-spiked diesel fuel, and both the intra-day precision over 3 days and the total precision are less than 3.5% (Table 1). The average FAME concentration (5.35%) is slightly above the target concentration (5.0%).

This method is still a work in progress, and we will continually increase both the range and the accuracy of the biodiesel quantitation. We also hope to include individual FAME speciation in some capacity, since many labs we’ve spoken with need to know and verify the source of their biodiesel (soy, canola, palm, tallow, etc.). Stay tuned for more updates as we receive updates from ASTM on the current method we have balloted.

GC-VUV can utilize the power of Time Interval Deconvolution™ to spectrally determine the total saturate (A), total mono-aromatic (B), total di-aromatic (C), and total tri(+)-aromatic (D) content of a typical diesel fuel. The total FAME content of biodiesel-spiked fuels (B05-B15) can also be determined (E).

Figure 1. GC-VUV can utilize the power of Time Interval Deconvolution™ to spectrally determine the total saturate (A), total mono-aromatic (B), total di-aromatic (C), and total tri(+)-aromatic (D) content of a typical diesel fuel. The total FAME content of biodiesel-spiked fuels (B05-B15) can also be determined (E). Image Credit: VUV Analytics

The quantitative results for total aromatics of 4 proficiency samples using GC-VUV and the 3 current ASTM methods. GC-VUV compares well to both the SFC and HLPC methods, which are the methods most used for diesel certification.

Figure 2. The quantitative results for total aromatics of 4 proficiency samples using GC-VUV and the 3 current ASTM methods. GC-VUV compares well to both the SFC and HLPC methods, which are the methods most used for diesel certification. Image Credit: VUV Analytics

Table 1. A preliminary precision study to quantitate total FAMEs in a biodiesel-spiked fuel (5.0% v/v). Intra-day repeatability and total precision over 3 days are both good, with all %RSDs below 3.5%. Source: VUV Analytics

This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by VUV Analytics.

For more information on this source, please visit VUV Analytics.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    VUV Analytics. (2020, September 14). Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview. AZoM. Retrieved on October 01, 2020 from https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=19598.

  • MLA

    VUV Analytics. "Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview". AZoM. 01 October 2020. <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=19598>.

  • Chicago

    VUV Analytics. "Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=19598. (accessed October 01, 2020).

  • Harvard

    VUV Analytics. 2020. Diesel & Biodiesel on the VUV Analyzer™ Platform: A Preview. AZoM, viewed 01 October 2020, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=19598.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit