AZoM - The A to Z of Materials
 


 
London and Scandinavian Metallurgical

Mid-Mountain Materials - A leading manufacturer of industrial textiles
NEW: Netzsch STA 449 F1 Jupiter® – Simultaneous TG-DSC
Approved Professional Development Courses from Loughborough University
Oxford instruments - materials identification, OES and XRF
Dynamic Ceramic a UK based manufacturer and supplier of Ceramic Components. The UK's leading specialist producer of zirconia, alumina and other advanced ceramics.
Zwick Roell / Your Partner for Materials Testing
Electromagnetic Interference Shielding With Perforated Metals

Electromagnetic Interference Shielding With Perforated Metals

Background

Perforated metal can be used to provide EMI/RFI shielding. To determine which perforated pattern is best suited for this function, 16 samples of perforated metal were tested at 9 frequency levels and their performance evaluated. Information about the samples, the frequencies used, and the results of the tests are provided in the tables that follow. The results are expressed in dB of Shielding Attenuation and in % of Attenuation.

Shielding Test Results

The test results show that Shielding Effectiveness of 40 dB provides 99.000% attenuation of the electromagnetic (EMI/RFI) radiation while a Shielding Effectiveness of 92 dB, the highest Shielding Effectiveness found in the tests, provides 99.997% attenuation. A Shielding Effectiveness of 40dB is the targeted minimum in most applications. Very effective shielding was provided by most samples up to frequencies of 7 GHz. Above that frequency, some of the samples dropped below 99.000% effective, but most samples stayed comfortably above 95% effective even at the highest frequency level of 10 GHz. The obvious conclusion to be reached is that there are many perforated patterns that designers can choose from to meet their design requirements.

The largest single source of leakage is along contact surfaces between two parts. If a tightly sealed electrical connection is not made, the leakage through the interface can be greater than through the structure.

Table 1. (Part A) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Hole Diameter (inches)

60° Centre Spacing

Open Area (%)

Thickness (inches)

Material

Sample Size (inches)

.040

.055

48.00

.022

Alum

8x8

.062

.093

40.00

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.062

.125

23.00

.025

Alum

8x8

.072

.100

47.00

.038

C.R. Steel

8x8

.075

.125

32.70

.049

C.R. Steel

8x8

.078

.109

46.10

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.079

.115

42.80

.036

C.R. Steel

8x8

.100

.187

25.90

.040

Alum

8x8

.125

.187

40.30

.030

Stainless

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.030

Alum

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.060

Alum

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.125

Alum

24x24

.156

.187

63.00

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

.156

.250

35.40

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

.187

.250

51.00

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.187

.250

51.00

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

Table 1. (Part B) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Shielding Effectiveness – Attenuation in dB

MHz

GHz

30

100

300

1

2

4

6

8

10

70

70

80

56

55

48

57

35

48

61

67

66

56

45

48

46

44

33

92

84

90

68

65

60

67

35

45

64

70

90

62

55

52

40

33

37

72

70

90

72

68

63

68

43

48

66

75

72

63

55

54

45

41

39

60

64

88

66

60

56

62

33

40

66

70

77

69

62

62

67

41

48

58

62

57

49

40

37

34

31

26

62

63

61

51

44

38

34

31

28

71

72

69

58

49

48

39

35

34

85

84

84

73

68

84

73

63

51

57

58

59

48

40

35

31

29

26

59

64

61

53

43

43

41

36

31

52

52

49

37

31

24

21

19

18

55

56

55

46

36

33

30

27

24

Table 1. (Part C) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Shielding Effectiveness - % Attenuation

MHz

GHz

30

100

300

1

2

4

6

8

10

99.97

99.97

99.99

99.84

99.82

99.60

99.86

98.22

99.60

99.91

99.96

99.95

99.84

99.44

99.60

99.50

99.37

97.76

100.0

99.99

99.97

99.96

99.94

99.90

99.96

98.22

99.44

99.94

99.97

99.97

99.92

99.82

99.75

99.00

97.76

98.59

99.98

99.97

99.97

99.98

99.96

99.93

99.96

99.29

99.60

99.95

99.98

99.98

99.93

99.82

99.80

99.44

99.11

98.88

99.90

99.94

100.0

99.95

99.90

99.84

99.92

97.76

99.00

99.95

99.97

99.99

99.92

99.92

99.92

99.96

99.11

99.60

99.87

99.92

99.86

99.65

99.00

98.59

98.01

97.18

94.99

99.92

99.93

99.91

99.72

99.37

98.74

98.01

97.18

96.02

99.97

99.98

99.86

99.87

99.65

99.60

98.88

98.22

98.01

99.99

99.99

99.99

99.98

99.96

99.99

99.98

99.93

99.72

99.86

99.87

99.89

99.60

99.00

98.22

97.16

96.45

94.99

99.89

99.94

99.91

99.78

99.29

99.29

99.11

98.42

97.18

99.75

99.75

99.65

99.59

97.18

93.69

91.09

88.78

88.78

99.82

99.84

99.82

99.50

99.42

97.76

96.84

95.53

93.69

 

Date Added: Jul 16, 2002


 

 

Email / Share
 
 
CILAS state of the art laser particle size analyzers
Materials Science books by Elsevier
University of Surrey-Short Courses and MSc in Materials science
X-Ray diffractometers from Shimadzu

 

version 2.0 - AZoM™ - The A to Z of Materials and AZojomo - The "AZo Journal of Materials Online"...AZoM™.com Pty.Ltd Copyright © 2000-2009