AZoM - The A to Z of Materials


 
CoorsTek manufactures advanced technical ceramic and high-performance plastic components.

University of Surrey-Short Courses and MSc in Materials science
World leader in design and manufacture of high-performance CCD, ICCD, sCMOS, EMCCD for scientific imaging, microscopy and spectroscopy applications
Materials testing services for aerospace to automotives, pharmaceuticals to polymers
Bruker Handheld XRF Spectrometers
Micromeritics is an Industry Leader in Particle Science and Particle Technology
CILAS state of the art laser particle size analyzers
Vesuvius - Solutions for molten metal, glass and renewable energy industries
NanoTest™, the complete nanomechanical testing center
X-Ray diffractometers from Shimadzu
Electromagnetic Interference Shielding With Perforated Metals

Electromagnetic Interference Shielding With Perforated Metals

Background

Perforated metal can be used to provide EMI/RFI shielding. To determine which perforated pattern is best suited for this function, 16 samples of perforated metal were tested at 9 frequency levels and their performance evaluated. Information about the samples, the frequencies used, and the results of the tests are provided in the tables that follow. The results are expressed in dB of Shielding Attenuation and in % of Attenuation.

Shielding Test Results

The test results show that Shielding Effectiveness of 40 dB provides 99.000% attenuation of the electromagnetic (EMI/RFI) radiation while a Shielding Effectiveness of 92 dB, the highest Shielding Effectiveness found in the tests, provides 99.997% attenuation. A Shielding Effectiveness of 40dB is the targeted minimum in most applications. Very effective shielding was provided by most samples up to frequencies of 7 GHz. Above that frequency, some of the samples dropped below 99.000% effective, but most samples stayed comfortably above 95% effective even at the highest frequency level of 10 GHz. The obvious conclusion to be reached is that there are many perforated patterns that designers can choose from to meet their design requirements.

The largest single source of leakage is along contact surfaces between two parts. If a tightly sealed electrical connection is not made, the leakage through the interface can be greater than through the structure.

Table 1. (Part A) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Hole Diameter (inches)

60° Centre Spacing

Open Area (%)

Thickness (inches)

Material

Sample Size (inches)

.040

.055

48.00

.022

Alum

8x8

.062

.093

40.00

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.062

.125

23.00

.025

Alum

8x8

.072

.100

47.00

.038

C.R. Steel

8x8

.075

.125

32.70

.049

C.R. Steel

8x8

.078

.109

46.10

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.079

.115

42.80

.036

C.R. Steel

8x8

.100

.187

25.90

.040

Alum

8x8

.125

.187

40.30

.030

Stainless

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.030

Alum

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.060

Alum

24x24

.125

.187

40.30

.125

Alum

24x24

.156

.187

63.00

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

.156

.250

35.40

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

.187

.250

51.00

.027

C.R. Steel

24x24

.187

.250

51.00

.057

C.R. Steel

24x24

Table 1. (Part B) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Shielding Effectiveness – Attenuation in dB

MHz

GHz

30

100

300

1

2

4

6

8

10

70

70

80

56

55

48

57

35

48

61

67

66

56

45

48

46

44

33

92

84

90

68

65

60

67

35

45

64

70

90

62

55

52

40

33

37

72

70

90

72

68

63

68

43

48

66

75

72

63

55

54

45

41

39

60

64

88

66

60

56

62

33

40

66

70

77

69

62

62

67

41

48

58

62

57

49

40

37

34

31

26

62

63

61

51

44

38

34

31

28

71

72

69

58

49

48

39

35

34

85

84

84

73

68

84

73

63

51

57

58

59

48

40

35

31

29

26

59

64

61

53

43

43

41

36

31

52

52

49

37

31

24

21

19

18

55

56

55

46

36

33

30

27

24

Table 1. (Part C) EMI/RFI shielding for various perforated metal materials.

Shielding Effectiveness - % Attenuation

MHz

GHz

30

100

300

1

2

4

6

8

10

99.97

99.97

99.99

99.84

99.82

99.60

99.86

98.22

99.60

99.91

99.96

99.95

99.84

99.44

99.60

99.50

99.37

97.76

100.0

99.99

99.97

99.96

99.94

99.90

99.96

98.22

99.44

99.94

99.97

99.97

99.92

99.82

99.75

99.00

97.76

98.59

99.98

99.97

99.97

99.98

99.96

99.93

99.96

99.29

99.60

99.95

99.98

99.98

99.93

99.82

99.80

99.44

99.11

98.88

99.90

99.94

100.0

99.95

99.90

99.84

99.92

97.76

99.00

99.95

99.97

99.99

99.92

99.92

99.92

99.96

99.11

99.60

99.87

99.92

99.86

99.65

99.00

98.59

98.01

97.18

94.99

99.92

99.93

99.91

99.72

99.37

98.74

98.01

97.18

96.02

99.97

99.98

99.86

99.87

99.65

99.60

98.88

98.22

98.01

99.99

99.99

99.99

99.98

99.96

99.99

99.98

99.93

99.72

99.86

99.87

99.89

99.60

99.00

98.22

97.16

96.45

94.99

99.89

99.94

99.91

99.78

99.29

99.29

99.11

98.42

97.18

99.75

99.75

99.65

99.59

97.18

93.69

91.09

88.78

88.78

99.82

99.84

99.82

99.50

99.42

97.76

96.84

95.53

93.69

 

Date Added: Jul 16, 2002


 

 

Email / Share
 
 
Microtrac Particle Size Distribution & Characterization Analyzers
Bodycote Heat Treatments - Electron Beam Welding Services
The New D8 ADVANCE – the 1st truly all-purpose Diffraction Solution for X-ray Powder Diffraction
Malvern Morphologi G3 particle characterization system
Approved Professional Development Courses from Loughborough University
Powerful MAC OS compatible scanning probe microscope SPM
ADMET universal materials testing machines

 

version 2.0 - AZoM™ - The A to Z of Materials and AZojomo - The "AZo Journal of Materials Online"...AZoM™.com Pty.Ltd Copyright © 2000-2010