Non-Invasive Temperature Measurement

TILO MERLIN, ANDREAS DECKER, JÖRG GEBHARDT, CHRISTIAN JOHANSSON – Temperature and pressure are the most common measurements made in the process industry. Around half of the temperature measurements are for monitoring purposes to ensure product quality, plant safety and increase process efficiency. There are virtually no chemical processes in which temperature measurement is not required. Suitable conventional temperature measurement instruments are widely available and they have become cheaper over time due to high production volumes, technological progress and competition. However, most these devices can be quite intrusive. ABB’s noninvasive, wireless and energy-autonomous temperature sensor is now changing the face of industrial temperature sensing, as has been demonstrated in a recent pilot installation in The Absolut Company’s vodka distillery in Sweden.

The heyday of technological advancement in temperature measurement took place in the 19th century. Thomas Johann Seebeck (thermoelectric effect, 1820) and Carl Wilhelm Siemens (platinum resistance thermometer, 1871) were two of the most prominent figures. ABB’s activities in industrial temperature measurements date back to 1881 when Wilhelm Siebert melted platinum in his family’s cigar-rolling factory in Hanau, Germany and formed the material into wires. Though subjected to continuous improvement, the main design – with a measuring inset, protected from the process medium by a strong thermowell and a connection head – changed little over the years and many of today’s devices are based on these early discoveries.

A key improvement was introduced in 1978 by ABB (Degussa at that time) with the implementation of an electronic transmitter inside the connection head. This combined the measuring circuit and the sensor element – functioning even in harsh environments – thus reducing the need for long sensor wires, which tend to be sensitive to electromagnetic interference that effects sensor accuracy and introduces signal noise. This major innovation paved the way for today’s distributed smart sensors that deliver standardized and linearized measurement values to a central control system [1].

Nearly 40 years on, and ABB has now revolutionized the temperature sensor once more, making it self-sufficient by introducing wireless communication as well as an energy-harvesting power supply that feeds the instrument from the temperature gradient between the process and its surroundings. These two technologies come together in the fully autonomous temperature instrument TSP300-W series. This ABB innovation was a significant milestone in temperature sensing and an enabler for wireless communication in process automation.

One remaining shortcoming of industrial temperature measurement devices, however, was the thermowell.

First transmitter for mounting inside the sensor head (TR01)

1. First transmitter for mounting inside the sensor head (TR01)

First autonomous temperature instrument TSP331-W

2. First autonomous temperature instrument TSP331-W

Thermowells

The thermowell protects the sensitive measuring inset from the hot, chemically aggressive, abrasive or pressurized flow inside pipes, boilers and vessels. However, the thermowell inhibits flow, causing the pressure to drop, and creating low pressure vortices downstream of the thermowell. This is known as vortex shedding and can cause the thermowell to vibrate. If the vortex shedding rate matches the natural frequency of the assembly, resonance occurs and dynamic bending stress increases substantially.

In terms of plant safety, thermowells are the most important part of a temperature instrument: At high flow speeds and pressures, an improperly designed thermowell can easily burst. Accordingly, standards have been developed by organizations such as ASME (American Society for Mechanical Engineers) to aid engineers in selecting suitable designs. However, for applications where the standard is not applicable, the engineer holds full responsibility for the proper design of shape, length, diameter, coating and interface type. Altogether, this leads to a greatly enlarged number of variants – resulting in higher cost, stock levels and logistic effort.

Apart from the safety issues, a thermowell impedes the process: it reduces the effective pipe cross-section and the pressure drop it causes may result in higher pump power consumption. It also creates an obstacle to pipe cleaning. Food, beverage and pharmaceutical plants are reluctant to use thermowells due to increased risk of contamination. In brownfield installations, the plant has to be shut down and the pipes emptied before the installation of intrusive devices. Thermowells also have a detrimental effect on the measurement itself as they introduce a temperature drop between medium and sensor, and latency. Finally, they are often the most difficult and expensive part to install as they frequently require welding.

In 2010, in response to some these challenges, ASME updated its basic standard for thermowell calculation [2], resulting in more hardwearing thermowells with larger diameters, stronger materials and shorter lengths. These changes only served to make the above measurement disadvantages worse.

Thermowells typically used for heavy-duty oil and gas applications

3. Thermowells typically used for heavy-duty oil and gas applications

Alternating vortex shedding – vortices occur at one side of the thermowell, then the other. The effect is also seen in a flag waving in the wind.

4. Alternating vortex shedding – vortices occur at one side of the thermowell, then the other. The effect is also seen in a flag waving in the wind.

TSP341-W noninvasive temperature measurement

5. TSP341-W noninvasive temperature measurement

Noninvasive Methods

The need for thermowells can be removed by using a non-invasive temperature measurement. Non-invasive instruments leave pipes and vessels unaffected, with many advantages:

  • The shells of pipes and vessels are not penetrated.
  • There is no need to drain the pipe for installation.
  • No welding is required on site and no special permission for hazardous areas is needed.
  • The possibility of contamination is eliminated.

These advantages have considerable ramifications: measurement points are now easy to install and can thus be used on a temporary basis – e.g., during setup and test of a new process or, if there are issues in production, for root-cause analysis. As soon as a satisfactory situation has been arrived at, the number of measurement locations can be reduced to an economically and technically appropriate long-term value.

Entire device

6a Entire device

Interface to target surface

6b Interface to target surface

6. Finite-element result for the temperature field in a typical setup before optimization

Why Have Noninvasive Methods not been Used Before?

There are several reasons why noninvasive technology has not been used in the majority of temperature measurement installations so far.

The simplest way to obtain a noninvasive temperature measurement would be to attach an existing instrument to the surface of a pipe or vessel instead of introducing it into a thermowell. However, the temperature sensor is then further removed from the process medium so that the response time would be reduced, and ambient conditions would have a bigger influence on the measurement.

Thus, a good noninvasive temperature instrument has to have an appropriate design of the route that the heat will take from the process to the sensor, which includes all materials and all interfaces through which the heat has to be transferred. It would also be beneficial if the existing (thermowell design) instrument could be adapted to fit as this would reduce the development effort significantly, keep the number of variants and additional parts low, and make it easy for the customer in terms of familiarity and certification retention.

A Challenging Case

The Absolut Company in Nöbbelöv, Sweden were given two autonomous [3], noninvasive temperature instruments so they could explore the device’s capabilities without having to interrupt the processes in their vodka distillery. To keep the effort on ABB’s side low, adapters were produced to mount existing (thermowell design) instruments with altered inset length to the pipes.

The sensors were easily integrated into the existing ABB Extended Automation System 800xA. The System 800xA automation platform has a built-in field device management system. This allows users to have one single system that covers operations, engineering and field device management – including functions such as device configuration and condition monitoring. This approach has significant benefits – reduced engineering hours, for example – since the complete solution, including field device configuration, is engineered in one system with one common engineering workflow. Another advantage is accelerated commissioning as complete signal checkout can be done by a single person from one screen.

After installation, the automation engineers from The Absolut reported that the energy harvesting functionality, as well as the wireless communication, were working well. However, measurement accuracy and the response time of the instruments were not meeting their expectations.

The temperature field is plotted along a path through the device during measurement.

7a The temperature field is plotted along a path through the device during measurement.

Sample temperature profiles across the device for various design iterations

7b Sample temperature profiles across the device for various design iterations

7. Systematic search for relevant design parameters

Improving the Measurement

A series of measurements at The Absolut revealed a detailed picture of the thermal situation at and around the instrument as well as at the adapter that connects the instrument to the pipe. After figuring out the cause of the measurement issues, the design of the adapter was improved and tested. The measurement inset and thermal interface materials were also modified. In the final configuration, measurement error was reduced to approximately 1 K (from several degrees Kelvin). As well as this, response time was decreased by 75 percent, such that both performance parameters were near those of an invasive temperature instrument.

Modeling

Physical understanding of the measurement points and subsequent modeling and simulation of the thermal situation were vital for arriving at a good design. Finite-element simulations and extensive automatic model-tuning [4] were used to analyze the relevant design parameters. Geometry, materials and interface properties could be effectively represented in the models.

Furthermore, it was critical to understand how the sensor temperature can be affected by details of the measurement situation – e.g., by different insulation types or different flow conditions. An understanding of these influences was generated via conjugate heat transfer calculations in which a hot or cold fluid is modeled flowing along a pipe where the instrument is mounted and/or where some axially homogeneous or spatially varying insulation is applied to the pipe. Typical temperature fields generated by these calculations are shown in ➔ 8.

Temperature field distortion in the case of a locally insulated fluid-conveying pipe

8a Temperature field distortion in the case of a locally insulated fluid-conveying pipe

Temperature field in the structure and velocity field in the fluid for a typical measurement situation

8b Temperature field in the structure and velocity field in the fluid for a typical measurement situation

8. Conjugate heat transfer has been analyzed in cosimulations of coupled finite-element and fluid-dynamic calculations

Easy Installation

The new and improved adapter can be mounted onto a wide range of pipe diameters; only the length of the clamps (simple steel bands) has to be altered, thus greatly reducing the number of variants and increasing flexibility. With less complexity the design requires less machining and allows simpler installation, which is especially beneficial in hard-to-reach locations. The installation does not require calibration or extensive parameterization.

Following this optimization, The Absolut Company installed four TSP341-W units and the predicted improvements in measurement accuracy and response time were confirmed.

A New Flexibility

Noninvasive, wireless and energy-autonomous temperature measurement heralds a new era of flexibility. With temperature measurement and the process of engineering it into a System 800xA DCS now made so easy, applications that add a high value – but traditionally have been difficult to justify from a cost perspective – are now easily attainable. One good example of such an application is short term instrumentation of processes during optimization and continuous improvement exercises or energy efficiency initiatives. Another example is to supply ABB’s System 800xA heat exchanger asset monitor (HXAM) – a condition monitoring tool that identifies heat exchanger performance changes and operational degradation – with the temperature inputs it requires to guarantee more energy-efficient operation and a reduction in maintenance costs. In large facilities, by improving heat exchanger performance substantial energy savings can be achieved.

Only applications with extreme spatial or temporal gradients pose a challenge to the complete closure of the gap between the performances of the noninvasive sensor and its invasive counterpart – both in terms of measurement accuracy as well as response time. A next logical step, once the thermomechanical options are spent, is to use advanced model-based algorithms that can correct the measurement.

References

[1] Industrial temperature measurement, basics and practice, Handbook for customers, ABB Automation Products, (2008).

[2] Thermowells, ASME standard no. PTC 19.3 TW-2010.

[3] M. Ulrich et al., “Autonomous wireless sensors for process instrumentation,” in GMA / ITG – Fachtagung: Sensoren und Messsysteme 2012, Nuremberg. [4] J. Gebhardt and K. König, “Model-based development for an energy-autonomous temperature sensor,” in VDI/VDE Mechatronik 2013, Aachen, Germany, 2013, pp. 177–181.

[4] J. Gebhardt and K. König, “Model-based development for an energy-autonomous temperature sensor,” in VDI/VDE Mechatronik 2013, Aachen, Germany, 2013, pp. 177–181.

This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by ABB Measurement & Analytics.

For more information on this source, please visit ABB Measurement & Analytics.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    ABB Measurement & Analytics. (2019, August 08). Non-Invasive Temperature Measurement. AZoM. Retrieved on January 26, 2020 from https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15443.

  • MLA

    ABB Measurement & Analytics. "Non-Invasive Temperature Measurement". AZoM. 26 January 2020. <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15443>.

  • Chicago

    ABB Measurement & Analytics. "Non-Invasive Temperature Measurement". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15443. (accessed January 26, 2020).

  • Harvard

    ABB Measurement & Analytics. 2019. Non-Invasive Temperature Measurement. AZoM, viewed 26 January 2020, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15443.

Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit