Automated Materials Testing - Features and Implementation of Automation System in Manufacturing Process by Instron

Increasing globalization and economic conditions have driven organizations to place a greater focus on productivity and quality. As global competition increases, organizations need to:

• operate more efficiently
• produce high-quality products
• maximize productivity

Quality management relates to all areas of business from product design to production and service. Manufacturing companies are investing more money and resources into enhancing technology in an effort to improve quality control and productivity. These companies are benefitting from technology innovation, such as automated testing systems, which increase productivity by having the ability to produce goods faster while maintaining high levels of quality. Companies that do not focus heavily on quality tend to lose customers and money, which leads to unexpected increases in manufacturing costs, along with poor customer satisfaction.

Mechanical Properties Testing

For many manufacturing companies, the quality of the product coming off their manufacturing line is monitored by materials testing laboratories. In many cases, manufacturing companies use either their in-house lab, or outsource to a contract testing lab. Mechanical properties for these products, whether it is a raw material or finished parts, are characterized using mechanical testing equipment. Tensile testing is the most common type of mechanical test; other test types include impact, compression, hardness and flexure. The product’s mechanical properties are checked and compared to a standard to determine if it meets the required specification. If not, the processes are adjusted and the product is discarded.

Cost Efficiency of Mechanical Testing

Usually, quality testing is conducted as a part of the manufacturing process. The amount of time it takes to communicate the results from quality tests to the manufacturing managers is critical, as money is lost due to manufacturing downtime and products that fail to meet specifications.

Mechanical testing can be expensive, and often, time consuming, which can lead to bottlenecks within the facility. Most manufacturers are not willing to let production lines run without verification that their product(s) meet the certain specifications; especially those companies that produce high volumes of costly products, such as sheet metal companies.

Challenges with Current Manufacturing Environment

For a quality management program to be effective, large volumes of consistent, accurate test results are required. Technique and precision is crucial for obtaining useful data, so it is important not to rush the test. This is a challenge for most companies since testing is traditionally conducted manually, which proves to be a slow and tedious process. Unfortunately, as test backlogs increase, the pressure associated with delayed production schedules often results with operators rushing through tests and cutting corners to avoid bottlenecks. This is a serious problem that results in poor or invalid data.

Factors Affecting Effective Quality Control Management

In addition to the pressure from delayed production schedules, high degrees of repetitive testing cause fatigue and boredom, leading to operator error. Inconsistencies in how specimens are inserted into grips or how extensometers are attached to specimens lower the integrity of the data – the same is true for dimensional measurement. No matter how slight the inconsistencies are within these processes, it may have a tremendous influence on the data.

Poor data may suggest that a product is out of spec when it actually isn’t, causing the production of that product to be stopped and discarded, which ultimately increases production costs. On the other hand, the data may suggest that a product is acceptable when it actually does not meet the required specifications. This could pose a serious problem for both the manufacturer and the end user, as the integrity of the product is jeopardized, which could result in possible injuries or lawsuits.

Introducing Automation into Manual Workflow

Gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies (GR&R) suggest that operator error is most commonly the greatest source of error, when compared to error in testing systems or within specimen variability. In an effort to reduce or eliminate operator error, companies have enhanced their technological capabilities by incorporating fully-automated mechanical testing systems into their labs. These automatic systems are designed with an automated specimen handling feature that increases production throughput, improves quality and work consistency, and increases profitability.

Cost Associated with Implementing Automation System

It is important to understand the costs associated with quality control when in the process of justifying an automated specimen handling system. Quality control costs consist of preventative, appraisal and external costs. Preventative costs are incurred before a quality issue is discovered and would include costs such as additional training and other proactive activities. Appraisal costs incur while determining a product's quality during manufacturing. External costs are the costs associated with a failure of quality control and are uncovered by a customer. External costs result in the greatest magnitude of loss, as they include production expenses, freight, customer service and most important, a negative impression left with the customer. Automated specimen handling systems fall within appraisal costs and improve appraisal efficiency and effectiveness. Effective appraisal systems lower preventative and external costs, and are typically far less in magnitude than external costs.

Statistical Quality Control Program

The success of statistical quality control and process control programs requires the ability to perform consistent and accurate tests in large volumes. This can be achieved with robotic specimen handling and loading, which ensures consistent test control procedures, consistency of hundreds of specimen insertions, and precise data analysis and reporting. In addition, automated measurement of specimen dimension and bar code reading stations eliminate the tedious error-prone processes that were mentioned previously.

Applications of Automation Systems

Automation systems are available in many configurations that meet the needs of a variety of applications including metals, plastics, and rubbers. Custom systems are available to accommodate the more complex specimen geometries and material types, as well as finished products.

Integrating An Effective Automation System

A typical tensile automation system consists of a mechanical testing machine, software, automatic specimen identification and dimension measurement, robotic material handling, and a specimen storage system. The operation of a system involves the robot moving specimens from the storage system, through an automatic identification and measurement sequence, and then installs the specimen into the grips. Once the sequence is started, the process takes place with no operator involvement. Data is collected, analyzed and reported, while systems communicate directly with existing laboratory information management software. Automated systems are capable of running attended around the clock.

Summary

Despite the significant initial costs associated with the integration of an automated testing system, the long-term benefits of automated systems far outweigh the risk and costs associated with correcting quality issues in the field.

This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by Instron.

For more information on this source, please visit Instron

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Instron - USA. (2019, February 08). Automated Materials Testing - Features and Implementation of Automation System in Manufacturing Process by Instron. AZoM. Retrieved on July 18, 2019 from https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4569.

  • MLA

    Instron - USA. "Automated Materials Testing - Features and Implementation of Automation System in Manufacturing Process by Instron". AZoM. 18 July 2019. <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4569>.

  • Chicago

    Instron - USA. "Automated Materials Testing - Features and Implementation of Automation System in Manufacturing Process by Instron". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4569. (accessed July 18, 2019).

  • Harvard

    Instron - USA. 2019. Automated Materials Testing - Features and Implementation of Automation System in Manufacturing Process by Instron. AZoM, viewed 18 July 2019, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4569.

Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit