Insights from industry

ROI for 3D Scanning Technology

In this interview, Martin Schuster of Laser Design, Inc. talks about how replacing traditional QA systems with 3D scanning can streamline processes and reduce time-to-market.

Can you give us a brief introduction to the systems and services that Laser Design provides?

Laser Design, a fully owned subsidiary of CyberOptics (CYBE), is the premier provider of ultra-precise 3D scanning systems and 3D measurement services.

Laser Design has helped customers successfully complete their most complex inspection, analysis, and reverse engineering projects for more than 30 years. Experienced metrologists and engineers know that today more than ever, accuracy, speed, and automation give manufacturers a competitive advantage.

Laser Design’s primary value proposition includes the substantial reduction of production lead times in the time-to-market product development cycle, labor savings, and consistency of QA process improvement.

Based on the automation of the 3D scanning inspection system technology, customers can realize significant inspection time reduction, with greater accuracy and complete 3D part comparison to CAD along with critical feature dimensions that are automatically reported.

What are the challenges of implementing 3D scanning in traditional QA environments?

Every day of lost profits due to bottlenecks found in the often slow QA process for new products – getting through final tooling acceptance / first article inspection approvals – can be extremely costly. Most don’t know the cost per day for lost profits until they look closely.

Laser Design has often been addressed during the sales cycle with the question; “I really love your 3D scanning technology, but how can I prove the return on investment (ROI) and payback of this system to my management?”

As an example, a Director of Quality Assurance at a company that makes plastic injection molded parts and the molds/tools that make those parts, has been asked by management to find a way to get production parts from the customer submitted CAD model into, and through the entire tooling development and piece, part production process faster, with high quality, and with fewer labor costs.

But before spending the company’s hard-earned money, two important things need to be proven: that the 3D Scanning technology works faster, better, easier, more reliably, and with less labor, and that it will pay for itself quickly.

Getting the demonstrations for the 3D scanning inspection technology working on your parts is simple and straight forward. The 3D scanning technology is used to measure your parts to emulate what you are doing, along with additional analysis that your current methods can’t do – like complete part 3D color error maps to your needed tolerances.

The technology does it in X amount of time, with Y amount of programming, and Z amount of labor. If it meets or exceeds your needs and expectations, then the next step is to develop the business case and ROI analysis. This can be a daunting task, but a requirement for almost all investment decisions that organizations make for capital equipment expenditure budgets.

The real problem for this is: who has time in a busy day for an in-depth investigation to ferret out all the benefits and costs for implementing a new QA process that may be resisted by a quality department that really doesn’t want to change?

So Laser Design teamed up with Edwin Boon, CEO of Rendement Group, a regional Black Belt QA consultant expert in both process reengineering and financial analysis.

The objective was to develop an ROI analysis template comparing the use of the 3D scanning inspection systems vs. the customer’s existing QA processes.

The focus of the ROI analysis was the hard-dollar benefits derived from a shorter inspection cycle times since this is always the strongest form of ROI to demonstrate.

What aspects of the process typically yield the biggest time savings when switching to 3D scanning technology?

In the current state section of the ROI model, it clearly shows that due to the combination of samples, cavities, and dimensions, the inspection time in the Quality department is very labor-intensive.

In fact, this is where the bottleneck occurs in the product development life cycle, causing backlogs and delays in time-to-market. Where it may take hours to inspect a part with traditional machines, it takes minutes with 3D scanning technology.

What was the resulting ROI in this case?

The sample part used in the ROI model showed the equivalent of 30+ man-days saved, due to significantly less manual inspection time.

The result of the analysis showed that almost half the time of the first article and part inspectors can be saved by replacing traditional equipment with 3D scanning systems.

We applied a weighted average based on revenue distribution to come up with an overall ROI for their company as a whole. The estimated time savings equated to about a 40-50% reduction in time-to-market, which aligns with similar studies we’ve conducted at other companies.

Besides the time savings, the new technology would also detect and quantify defects not defined or inspected using 2D or more single location measuring technologies (CMM’s, Touch Probe measuring, Hand Held measuring tools, etc.).

Given the cost to implement a 3D scanning inspection process, the payback period was determined to be about a 9 months for the 3D scanning technology (Laser Design’s SURVEYOR ZS Series – CMM / Laser Scanning technology – accurate to +/- 6µ).

The cost of the SURVEYOR ZS Series – 3D Laser Scanning System was about $185,000 for a turnkey system solution.

Tell us about the new CyberGage360 3D Scanning System - what makes this system so unique?

The highly accurate CyberGage360 combines the speed of 3D non-contact projection scanning with the ease of use and automation associated with the use of a common microwave oven.

One button controls the scanning and output of a complete inspection report. Anyone can use it with little training, which allows this technology to be located anywhere – office, factory floor, warehouse for incoming parts acceptance testing, or R&D for a quick check of prototypes or 3D printed parts.

No other 3D metrology systems, or even 2D measuring systems, are at this level of ease of use. Plus, the system incorporates CyberOptics’ proprietary Multi-Reflection Suppression (MRS) technology for highly accurate scan data.

Automatically generates inspection reports including comparison to CAD models and “golden examples.

Automatically generates inspection reports including a comparison to CAD models and “golden examples.

Where can readers find more information about your 3D scanning systems?

Visit our website, and get in touch - our team will be happy to discuss our systems and how to prove ROI for your application.

About C. Martin Schuster

C. Martin SchusterMr. C. Martin Schuster is Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of Laser Design, Inc., Minneapolis, MN founded in 1987. Laser Design Inc. was acquired by CyberOptics Corporation on March 14, 2014.

Mr. Schuster continues as President of Laser Design, the leading supplier of ultra-precise, 3D laser scanning systems and services used for capturing the 3D shape of objects, products, or models with complex shape geometries. Primary applications include inspection and reverse engineering and product design for industrial, medical, military, and commercial products.

He is a member of the Board of Trustees of Dunwoody College of Technology, Minneapolis, MN – a nonprofit, educational institution for 2 and 4-year degreed industrial engineering and manufacturing technologies. Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) – Certified Manufacturing Technologist (CFMFGT) - 1985. Awarded Industry Pioneer Award, 2011, Rapid Prototyping / 3D Scanning SME.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the interviewee and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited (T/A) AZoNetwork, the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and Conditions of use of this website.

Will Soutter

Written by

Will Soutter

Will has a B.Sc. in Chemistry from the University of Durham, and a M.Sc. in Green Chemistry from the University of York. Naturally, Will is our resident Chemistry expert but, a love of science and the internet makes Will the all-rounder of the team. In his spare time Will likes to play the drums, cook and brew cider.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    CyberOptics Corporation. (2020, October 15). ROI for 3D Scanning Technology. AZoM. Retrieved on April 25, 2024 from https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=12902.

  • MLA

    CyberOptics Corporation. "ROI for 3D Scanning Technology". AZoM. 25 April 2024. <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=12902>.

  • Chicago

    CyberOptics Corporation. "ROI for 3D Scanning Technology". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=12902. (accessed April 25, 2024).

  • Harvard

    CyberOptics Corporation. 2020. ROI for 3D Scanning Technology. AZoM, viewed 25 April 2024, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=12902.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.