Corrosion-Resistant Alloys: Operational Safety in High Risk Environments

By Ankit SinghReviewed by Frances BriggsOct 8 2025

Corrosion-resistant alloys and precise material verification underpin safety in oil and gas operations, where even small metallurgical errors can trigger costly failures and regulatory consequences.

Image Credit: Parilov/Shutterstock.com

Oil and gas infrastructure is frequently exposed to hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, chlorides, and elemental sulfur, all capable of corroding parts from the inside out. Ordinary carbon steel is commonly used for its low cost, but it can develop issues like stress corrosion cracking and pitting, which may lead to leaks or explosions.^1,2

Corrosion-resistant alloys (CRAs) offer an essential defense. By forming chemically stable, self-healing oxide layers that shield substrate metals from corrosion, extending the service life of pipelines, wellheads, and pressure vessels.

The addition of elements like chromium, molybdenum, and nickel to CRAs improves resistance to both general and localized corrosion, helping to maintain the structural integrity of critical assets and ensuring safer resource extraction and processing.^1,2

Conducting Checks with Positive Material Identification

PMI is used across the oil and gas industry to verify the chemical composition of installed alloys and prevent costly failures. Fast, non-destructive analysis verifies that installed alloys meet their specified chemical composition. In environments with harsh process conditions, the presence of the correct alloy type can mean the difference between sustained integrity and premature catastrophic failure.^3,4,5

PMI is important not only for new installations but also for ongoing checks during maintenance and upgrades. It spots errors in material substitution, evaluates the accuracy of supplier information, and supports maintenance decisions. Over the lifespan of an asset, such verification protects both performance and compliance.^3,4,5

Alloy Mix-Ups: When Things Go Wrong

Material mix-ups, mislabeling, and incomplete records can quietly undermine corrosion resistance. A single nonconforming component may perform normally at first, only to corrode or crack rapidly when exposed to sulfur-rich or chloride-laden streams. 

Such failures can be catastrophic, resulting in environmental contamination, injuries, or even fatalities, along with legal penalties. Investigations into sudden pipeline ruptures often trace back to unverified materials or gaps in documentation. Such cases emphasize the non-negotiable need for stringent verification and traceability in material use.^1,2,6

Technologies for Field Verification

PMI technologies have become faster, smaller, and more versatile than ever. X-ray fluorescence analyzers are widely used for on-site alloy sorting, quickly identifying elements such as chromium and nickel. But it has its limits: XRF cannot measure light elements like carbon, essential for identifying different types of steel.^3,7,8

Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) covers that gap, measuring both major and trace elements, including carbon, though it requires surface preparation and sometimes sample immobilization. More recently, advances in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) have improved the analysis of light elements, particularly in low-carbon grades suitable for sour service.

Choosing the right verification method out of these options depends on operational needs and regulatory documentation requirements.^3,7,8

Role of PMI in Regulatory Compliance

International standards, such as ISO 15156, API, and company-specific protocols, dictate the qualification, documentation, and testing of CRA materials for hostile oil and gas environments. PMI supports compliance by establishing a definitive chain of evidence for all critical asset components, from the mill to installation.^2,9

Checks are often mandated after repairs, replacements, or modifications, and the resulting records form the foundation for legal and safety reviews. Without them, demonstrating compliance, or defending an incident, becomes nearly impossible.^2,9

Alloys That Set the Standard

Several CRAs have become industry benchmarks for their targeted characteristics in distinct operational settings.

• Inconel 625: High in nickel and chromium, with molybdenum and niobium for added strength, it resists pitting and stress corrosion cracking in acidic and subsea environments.^1,2,9
• Hastelloy C276: Valued for its high molybdenum and tungsten content, this alloy performs well in both oxidizing and reducing conditions, tolerating even high chloride exposure.^2,9
• Duplex 2205 and Super Duplex 2507: These ferritic-austenitic stainless steels combine strength with resistance to chloride stress cracking, making them well-suited for use in seawater injection, topside facilities, and riser systems exposed to fluctuating chemical threats.^1,2
• Alloy 825: A balanced, cost-effective Ni-Fe-Cr alloy enriched with molybdenum and copper, 825 performs reliably in mildly acidic conditions, although it can be less resilient in harsher environments, so careful material selection is important.^2,9

Microstructure and Processing Impacts on CRA Performance

An alloy's composition, however, is only half the story. Processing and microstructure play an equally critical role. Improper heat treatment can produce sigma phases or chromium carbides that weaken corrosion resistance, even in premium alloys.^1,2,9

Welding is another risk: chromium depletion along grain boundaries can lead to localized attack. To ensure safety, quality assurance should include PMI and microstructural checks, such as hardness tests and metallographic inspections. In high-pressure, high-temperature situations, even minor variations can accelerate corrosion, so careful process control is essential. ^1,2,9

Conclusion

CRAs are fundamental for safe and durable oil and gas operations. PMI ensures that every component meets its specification, anchoring both compliance and operational integrity. As regulations tighten and materials evolve, combining advanced verification techniques with disciplined control will be essential for asset security. Building on lessons from alloy mix-up incidents and using modern analytical tools helps the industry strengthen the reliability of its most vital systems.

References and Further Reading

1. Klenam, D. et al. (2024). Corrosion resistant materials in high-pressure high-temperature oil wells: An overview and potential application of complex concentrated alloys. Engineering Failure Analysis, 157, 107920. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107920. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630723008749
2. Reda, A. et al. (2025). Review of Material Selection for Corrosion-Resistant Alloy Pipelines. Engineered Science. DOI:10.30919/es1373. https://www.espublisher.com/journals/articledetails/1373
3. Bauer, M. (2021). Conducting Retroactive Positive Material Identification to Prevent Failures related to Corrosion in the Oil & Gas Industry. Thermo Fisher. https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/mining/conducting-retroactive-positive-material-identification-to-prevent-failures-related-to-corrosion-in-the-oil-gas-industry/
4. Overview of Positive Material Identification. Inspectioneering. https://inspectioneering.com/tag/positive+material+identification
5. Sotoodeh, K. (2024). Positive Material Identification Procedure Development to Prevent Valve Corrosion Failures. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 24, 1512–1521. DOI:10.1007/s11668-024-01951-5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11668-024-01951-5
6. Al-Moubaraki, A. H. et al. (2021). Corrosion challenges in petroleum refinery operations: Sources, mechanisms, mitigation, and future outlook. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 25(12), 101370. DOI:10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101370. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319610321001757
7. Diesing, G. (2023). Evolution of PMI Technology: Advancements in Handheld XRF Propel Accuracy, Connectivity, and Efficiency: THE SUITE OF TOOLS AVAILABLE FOR PMI HAS GROWN. Quality, vol. 62, no. 11. Gale Academic OneFile. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=anon~9168ee2e&id=GALE%7CA777498772&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=d6869538
8. Dalton, B. (2020). What is LIBS and What Does It Have to Do With PMI? Thermo Fisher. https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/metals/what-is-libs-and-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-pmi/
9. Sridhar, N. et al. (2018). Corrosion-resistant alloy testing and selection for oil and gas production. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology. DOI:10.1080_1478422X.2017.1384609. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/1478422X.2017.1384609

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.