Posted in | News | Graphene

New Modeling Shows How Graphene's Layers Deform and Stabilize

New GPU-accelerated modeling reveals the hidden mechanics behind graphene’s AB-BA transitions and the defects that freeze them in place.

Graphene render in blue with translucent bubbles representing carbon atoms. Teal/blue background.

Study: Phase-Field Crystal Method for Bilayer Graphene. Image Credit: DRN Studio/Shutterstock.com

Published in Nanomaterials, the new study presents a computational model that tracks the formation and evolution of stacking domains in bilayer graphene, revealing how AB and BA regions shift, stabilize, and become pinned by defects.

By integrating a generalized stacking-fault energy (GSFE) potential into a structural phase-field crystal (PFC) framework, the researchers provide a scalable approach to studying defect dynamics.

Why Stacking Order Matters for Electronic Performance

Stacking order strongly shapes the electronic properties of bilayer graphene, with AB (Bernal) stacking being the most stable configuration.

Atomistic methods can faithfully capture this behavior, but they are often too computationally intensive for large-scale studies.

More conventional continuum models, however, lack the resolution needed to describe stacking energetics and defect formation.

The team's new framework bridges this gap by incorporating a GSFE-derived potential that captures the interaction between the upper graphene layer and a fixed bottom layer.

It allows the model to simulate AB-BA domain boundaries with atomic-level fidelity while maintaining long-timescale efficiency. The predicted boundary widths align with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and previously published STEM measurements.

Get all the details: Grab your PDF here!

A PFC Model Simulates Bilayer Graphene at Scale

The researchers extended the structural PFC model by adding a bottom-layer interaction potential informed by first-principles GSFE data.

Simulations were initialized either from random phase fields or predefined AB and BA regions, enabling controlled studies of ribbon-like domains and circular stacking inclusions.

The strength of the external potential was calibrated by matching transition widths obtained from MD simulations across multiple boundary orientations.

Fast Fourier transform (FFT) solvers and CUDA-based GPU acceleration delivered performance gains approaching two orders of magnitude over CPU implementations, making large-domain and long-duration simulations practical.

What the Simulations Revealed

In ribbon geometries, AB-BA boundaries formed with thicknesses that varied systematically with orientation, a trend consistent with atomistic modeling.

When circular regions of one stacking order were embedded within the other, they evolved into hexagonal or triangular shapes rather than collapsing directly. These shapes were anchored by localized five to seven carbon-ring defects at their vertices, which pinned the boundaries and stabilized the domains.

When the transition between AB and BA was initialized smoothly, the central domain shrank at a curvature-driven rate, matching theoretical expectations for boundary motion under constant mobility.

This indicates the model’s ability to capture both steady-state structures and slower, diffusive processes typically beyond the reach of atomistic approaches.

Taken together, the results demonstrate how stacking boundaries form, migrate, and become locked in place. These behaviors ultimately influence the mechanical and electronic response of bilayer graphene.

How the Model Could Advance Microstructure Research

The study presents a quantitatively calibrated PFC framework that can simulate AB–BA transitions and associated defect structures with both atomic detail and continuum-scale efficiency.

By matching interface widths to MD benchmarks and leveraging GPU acceleration, the model provides a practical platform for studying microstructural evolution in bilayer graphene.

Though focused on bilayer graphene, this technique has potential relevance for other layered materials where stacking energetics and defect pinning play key roles.

Its combination of atomistic grounding and computational scalability could be valuable in future investigations of microstructure-driven properties in two-dimensional systems.

Journal Reference

Qiao, H., Liu, K. (2025). Phase-Field Crystal Method for Bilayer Graphene. Nanomaterials, 15(22), 1699. DOI:10.3390/nano15221699

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. (2025, November 13). New Modeling Shows How Graphene's Layers Deform and Stabilize. AZoM. Retrieved on November 13, 2025 from https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=65031.

  • MLA

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. "New Modeling Shows How Graphene's Layers Deform and Stabilize". AZoM. 13 November 2025. <https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=65031>.

  • Chicago

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. "New Modeling Shows How Graphene's Layers Deform and Stabilize". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=65031. (accessed November 13, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. 2025. New Modeling Shows How Graphene's Layers Deform and Stabilize. AZoM, viewed 13 November 2025, https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=65031.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.