Editorial Feature

Challenges PERC Solar Cells Face

Image Credits: nevodka/shutterstock.com

The primary driver of solar cell research development is the quest to enhance efficiency while reducing costs.

Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) solar cells achieve greater efficiencies than conventional solar cells, which appear to be reaching their physical limits for efficiency. By using a more-advanced cell architecture, PERC solar cells are prime candidates for the next generation of solar panels.

The technology allows manufacturers to upgrade existing cells with a bit of tooling and achieve higher efficiencies. While the production method calls for more steps, the boost in efficiency enables significant decrease in costs at both the cells level and the system level.

Two main steps are applied to a conventional back surface field (BSF) solar cell to produce a PERC solar cell. First, a rear exterior passivation film is applied to the cell. Second, lasers or chemicals are used to create small pockets in the film and allow for more light absorption.

These two steps supply three benefits: lower electron recombination, more light is absorption and greater internal reflectivity.

When sunlight strikes non-PERC solar cells, some of it passes through. However, with a PERC cell, the passivation layer reflects unabsorbed light back to the solar cell for a second absorption pass, which results in a more efficient solar cell.

Like for any new technology, a big challenge for PERC technology determining how to scale it up while maintaining fidelity. There are also two primary technical difficulties associated with PERC technology.

The first is Light Induced Degradation (LID), an effect that causes a cell to lose a percentage of its production after first exposition to light. The second challenge to PERC technology is Probable Induced Degradation (PID). This type of defect can totally damage the performances of a solar panel.

Image Credits: Iaremenko Sergii/shutterstock.com

Light Induced Degradation (LID)

At best, LID can neutralize the efficiency boost provided by the PERC solar cell enhancements. At worst, LID can push efficiency below that of conventional ASF cells.

The two best-known mechanisms behind LID are the activation of boron–oxygen (B–O) complexes and the dissociation of iron–boron (FeB) pairs.

B-O LID is driven by significant oxygen and boron levels in the wafer, with monocrystalline silicon being most vulnerable due to its high oxygen concentration. Conversely, multicrystalline silicon is much less vulnerable due to lower oxygen concentrations.

In FeB LID, the shift in the Fermi level during illumination triggers a neutralization of the iron ions, which consequently separate from the boron atoms. Interstitial iron causes a much greater charge carrier recombination under operating conditions. The resulting dissociation of iron-boron pairs causes a severe efficiency loss in cells, particularly those with a high iron concentration.

Potential Induced Degradation (PID)

In an ideal world, solar panels should maintain optimum performance for 20 years. However, most sustain peak performance for 2 or 3 years. Possible Induced Degradation (PID) is what causes this less-than-ideal efficiency drop. PID can cause a power loss of up to 30 percent and solar panels to last for a relatively short amount of time.

PID is triggered by minor, unwanted currents between the two sides of a solar cell. These currents are facilitated by the migration of sodium ions from the glass plate through the encapsulation and the Anti-Reflective Coating into the cell.

The presence of these ions creates an effective shunt path across the cell and cuts down on power output. The impact is cumulative with the passage of time.

Heat, humidity, and adverse voltage are known to cause PID, but it is not clear why this happens in the first place or in only certain PERC solar panels.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Brett Smith

Written by

Brett Smith

Brett Smith is an American freelance writer with a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Buffalo State College and has 8 years of experience working in a professional laboratory.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Smith, Brett. (2018, May 21). Challenges PERC Solar Cells Face. AZoM. Retrieved on April 19, 2024 from https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15911.

  • MLA

    Smith, Brett. "Challenges PERC Solar Cells Face". AZoM. 19 April 2024. <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15911>.

  • Chicago

    Smith, Brett. "Challenges PERC Solar Cells Face". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15911. (accessed April 19, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Smith, Brett. 2018. Challenges PERC Solar Cells Face. AZoM, viewed 19 April 2024, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15911.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.