© Lev Kropotov/Shutterstock.com
Concrete is an essential construction material that is used globally. Combining coring and rebound surveys provides the most efficient and cost-effective method of assessing in situ concrete strength, a critical property for safety and quality control in concrete structures. The new Original Schmidt Live hammer from Proceq uses automation to take the headache out of obtaining rebound numbers and increase efficiency by 90%.
Concrete is the most widely used synthetic material in the world due to its high compressive strength, durability, long life, and fire-resistant properties. Every year, millions of tons of concrete are used in large construction projects including dams, bridges, buildings, and roads.
Monitoring concrete strength is essential for safety and quality control
Structures built with concrete that do not possess sufficient strength can develop cracks or even collapse, which can have catastrophic consequences. Assessing the compressive strength of concrete in finished structures, known as
in situ strength, ensures that concrete has cured correctly and possesses the required strength for the final structure to be safe, durable, and meet any required regulations. In situ strength testing can also be used to assess the condition of older concrete structures or those undergoing modifications. Although compressive strength can be measured easily in a laboratory using a compression testing machine, testing the strength of concrete structures in situ can be more challenging. Coring provides precise measurements of
in situ concrete strength
Coring is the most reliable and precise method for testing
in situ concrete strength. Coring involves cutting cylinders of concrete from various locations in the structure. The compressive strength of the cores is then tested using a compression testing machine, where compression testing is most widely accepted as the reference method for determining core strength.
While coring provides precise measurements of concrete strength when carried out correctly, the method comes with major drawbacks, in that coring is expensive and limited. Removing too many cores can leave weak points in the concrete structure and damage its performance, so conducting a complete assessment of concrete strength using coring alone is impossible. Consequently, coring is often supported or replaced by non-destructive methods of measuring concrete strength, which can aid efficient coring assessments and reduce costs.
Rebound hammer surveys compliment coring to reduce costs
Rebound hammers, also known as Schmidt hammers, are the most commonly used instrument for non-destructive
in situ concrete strength testing. Schmidt hammers are popular because they are inexpensive, easy to use, relatively quick, and of course, non-destructive. Schmidt hammers determine the surface hardness, which is correlated to compressive strength, or used for uniformity testing to locate weaker areas in the structure.
A rebound hammer survey is recommended to identify the best locations for coring and reduce the number of cores required, increasing efficiency and reducing costs. Furthermore, rebound and core testing data can be compared and correlated to provide an overall assessment of the entire structure.
Schmidt hammer testing gives reliable estimates of
in situ concrete strength if the testing is done according to the relevant standards. EN 12504-2 provides the method for determination of the rebound number at one test location. EN13791 provides the method for determination of the in-situ compressive strength using NDT methods.
To determine the compressive strength of a test region according to EN13791, you must make measurements at a minimum of 9 test locations. Then they must be evaluated according to certain rules.
For each impact measurement, the user must unlock the Schmidt hammer, execute the impact, read the scale, and note down the measurement. When all the impacts have been conducted, the user must then calculate the median value and compare each value to the median, then reject any measurements that differ from the median by more than 30%. The rebound value can then be calculated.
VIDEO The Original Schmidt Live saves time in both data collection and report generation
The new Original Schmidt Live Type N from Proceq uses automation to remove all the effort from obtaining a rebound number. It also presents the first time where a hammer has been able to include test region reporting. It makes testing in accordance with standards simple, providing confidence in
in situ concrete strength and structure safety.
An Original Schmidt Live user can conduct all 9 hammer impacts in a row without stopping, and then the result can be obtaining either directly on the hammer or via the mobile app. The Original Schmidt Live iPhone app promotes simplicity for the user as it automatically records each impact reading, verifies the sequence, and calculates the rebound number according to the major standards.
Additionally, hammer calibration is tracked automatically, and the app’s logbook functionality makes tracing and reporting measurements simple. Further to this and unlike classical R-value hammers, the Original Schmidt Live makes the users job easier by correcting the result for the impact angle automatically.
The measurements and processing for each rebound value can be completed in under one minute, less than 10% of the time it takes to conduct and record the measurements and calculations manually. Hence, the Original Schmidt Live increases productivity by 90% while reducing the risk of obtaining inaccurate results due to human error.
‘An approach to in-situ compressive strength of concrete’ Brunarski L, Dohojda M, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 2016.
‘Testing the compressive strength of concrete’,
https://www.nrmca.org/aboutconcrete/cips/35p.pdf ‘Original Schmidt Live – most advanced concrete strength and uniformity test hammer’,
This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by Proceq.
For more information on this source, please visit