Processing Techniques  Most composite  applications can be divided into three categories determined by performance  requirements as defined by reinforcement characterisation:   •        Structural:  continuous aligned fibres   •        Semi structural:  continuous non aligned fibres   •        Non structural:  discontinuous fibres   Table 1 outlines the  main areas of composite consumption in the USA in the period 1991 to 1994.  While the majority of the industries identified in table 1 cover more than  one application type, they can be generally classified into one of the above.  The major processing routes used to fabricate components within these  performance bands are represented in figure 1, together with the annual  production quantities normally associated with these processes. It is  apparent that there is a lack of process technology which addresses the  volume markets in the structural and semi structural areas. This factor is a  major contributor to the limited growth of composites in the industries  requiring such components.   Table 1.  Composite shipments for the period 1991-1994 from the USA in millions of kg.            |          |                            |      Aerospace      |          17.6      |          14.7      |          11.5      |          11.0      |            |      Business equipment      |          61.3      |          65.0      |          66.9      |          72.9      |            |      Construction      |          190.5      |          219.1      |          240.4      |          270.7      |            |      Consumer products      |          67.4      |          73.6      |          75.2      |          79.3      |            |      Corrosion    resistant products      |          161.0      |          150.7      |          159.7      |          170.7      |            |      Electrical      |          104.8      |          117.9      |          124.7      |          135.8      |            |      Marine      |          124.7      |          138.1      |          144.8      |          164.9      |            |      Transportation      |          309.4      |          340.2      |          372.9      |          428.9      |            |      Other      |          33.5      |          37.8      |          40.5      |          46.2      |            |      Total      |          1070.2      |          1157.1      |          1236.6      |          1380.4      |                          |             |            |      Figure 1. Composite manufacturing processes.      |             Productivity  Productivity increases  are already being attained by the combined efforts of raw material suppliers,  equipment manufacturers, trade moulders and end users. Target productivities  for four processing techniques are shown in figure 2. Processing techniques  can also be classified in terms of open mould processes (e.g. hand lay up,  filament winding), closed mould processes (vacuum bag moulding, RTM, SMC) and  continuous processes (pultrusion).            |             |            |      Figure 2. Target productivities for composite manufacturing processes.      |             Sheet Moulding Compounds  Until the mid 1980s  the moulding of Sheet Moulding Compounds (SMCs) was considered a slow  process, but nevertheless capable of delivering both small and large  non-structural components with a surface finish superior to all other  composite processing methods. SMC can refer to both the material and the  process. Complex shapes and details that may not be possible with sheet metal  can often be achieved relatively easily with SMC. The material usually  comprises a filled polyester resin and glass fibre, which is either chopped,  continuous, or a mix of both. When ready to mould, it normally has a  consistency similar to that of thick putty, as it will be partially cured (B  staged). As the name suggests, SMC is supplied in sheet form and in many  respects can be considered a low performance prepreg. The sheets are  essentially compression moulded to final shape.   Cycle Times  Commonly achieved  cycle times were of the order of four minutes, resulting in processors  operating multiple dies and ancillary equipment to keep up with production  demands from their main customer, the automotive industry. Whilst this  increases cost, it also enhances further the risk of process or part  variations. A major deficiency of SMC components has been their structural  inconsistency caused by uneven distribution of reinforcement during flow of  the charge material. Much effort has been focused on the SMC moulding process  in recent years, which has led to the 1 part per minute barrier being  challenged. A key development enabling this improvement has been vacuum  assisted moulding.   Vacuum Assisted Moulding  In conventional SMC  processes, charge loading and press closure speeds are selected with the  primary aim of forcing out entrapped air. Typically, `stacks’ of charge are  placed in the mould, covering only 40% of the mould surface, and mould  closure rates are in the order of 0.1 m.min-1. With vacuum  assistance, a one atmosphere vacuum is applied prior to closing the mould.  This enables the charge to be spread to cover up to 90% of the mould surface  and closure speeds at 0.9 m.min-1 to be achieved without  entrapping air.   The increase in mould  surface coverage by the charge has several additional benefits associated  with the reduced materials flow. Wave patterns and flow lines are eliminated  and localised strength of components is enhanced due to better retention of  fibre orientation. Specially introduced orientation is now feasible and a  high strength SMC process is available where unidirectional fibres are  arranged at specific locations. Raw material suppliers are developing faster  reacting resin systems designed to take advantage of the lower flow, higher  speed requirements. Equipment manufacturers are investing in automation and  control of the process. These continuing activities are positioning SMC for a  resurgence of interest in high volume semi structural applications.   Pultrusion  In the pultrusion  process (figure 3) dry reinforcements are impregnated with a specially  prepared low viscosity liquid resin system and drawn through a die heated to  about 120-150°C where curing occurs. The solid laminate, which has assumed  the shape of the die, is withdrawn by a series of haul off grippers and cut  to length or coiled. Pultrusion is unique among the processes under  consideration in that it is capable of producing complex components on a  continuous basis. The process can basically produce any shape that can be  extruded. It is also not allied to any one industry and applications range  from civil engineering to electrical. These factors combine to give  pultrusion one of the highest predicted growth rates of all composite  process.            |             |            |      Figure 3. Schematic of the pultrusion process.      |             Currently, the  requirements of pultruders and their suppliers are stronger market  development and higher productivity to capitalise on these projections.  Faster production rates are one way of achieving this, but the industry  itself has recognised the need for greater consistency of raw materials and  process operation, coupled with the ability to monitor the product quality  more closely.   Polyester-Based Resin Systems  At present, production  is dominated by polyester-based resin systems, which have relatively wide  processing windows. This has resulted in pultrusion remaining primarily an  art rather than a science. Over the last five years equipment manufacturers  have been concentrating on the provision of more sophisticated machinery,  with the ability to run multiple tools. The industry has been striving to  develop monitoring and control systems which permit the process to run more  efficiently by reducing scrap levels and decreasing commissioning time  normally associated with new dies or materials. A better understanding of the  process has enabled more challenging resin system to be considered and  ongoing programmes include the evaluation of phenolics and thermoplastics.   Phenolic Resin Systems  Traditional phenolic  materials pose three main problems to the pultrusion process: volatile  release, high reactivity and corrosion. These result in high void contents,  narrow processing windows and rapid tool wear. Process modifications have  been implemented and new resins formulated to allow more `user friendly’ and  reproducible processing. Phenolic pultruded profiles are now available and  undergoing further development to enable the range of profiles to be extended  and production costs to be reduced. The market is already demanding the use  of pultruded section as replacement for beams, roof supports and modular  building components. With tightening fire and toxic fume emission  requirements, the future for phenolics looks bright.   Pultrusion Developments  The major restrictions  on pultruded components, which currently exist, may also be significantly  reduced over the next few years. With very few exceptions, products must be  parallel sided and have weaker transverse mechanical properties than those  obtainable in the axial orientation, due to the inherent fibre alignment.  Thermoplastics have already shown dramatic productivity increases but also  offer the possibility of post forming sections into non-parallel sided  shapes. Similarly, the introduction of the pullwinding variants provides the  ability to accurately position transverse fibres thereby redressing the  balance with the axial performance.   Filament Winding  High speed precise  laying down of resin impregnated continuous fibres onto a mandrel is the  basis of the filament winding process (figure 4). Pressure vessels, pipes and  drive shafts have all been manufactured using filament winding. The mandrel  can be any shape that does not have re-entrant curvature, although it is  possible to remove the component from the mandrel before it has cured and use  some other means of compaction to produce reverse curvature if required.  Multi axis winding machines can also be used. The process is usually computer  controlled and the reinforcement can be oriented to match the design loads.  Components from small diameter tubes to 40 m, 13 tonne wind turbine blades  have been manufactured using filament winding. One European company now  manufactures commuter train carriages by a variation of the filament winding  process.            |             |            |      Figure 4. Schematic of the filament winding process.       |             The fibres may be  impregnated with resin before winding (wet winding), preimpregnated (dry  winding) or postimpregnated. Wet winding has the advantages of using the  lowest cost materials with long storage life and low viscosity. The prepreg  systems produce parts with more consistent resin content and can often be  wound faster.   Materials  Glass fibre is the  fibre most frequently used for filament winding, while carbon and aramid  fibres are also used. Most high strength critical aerospace structures are  produced with epoxy resins, with either epoxy or cheaper polyester resins  being specified for most other applications. The ability to use continuous  reinforcement without any breaks or joins is a definite advantage for  filament winding, as is the high fibre volume fraction that is obtainable  (60-80%). Only the inner surface of a filament wound structure will be smooth  unless a secondary operation is performed on the outer surface. The component  is normally cured at high temperature before removing the mandrel. Finishing  operations such as machining or grinding are not normally necessary.   Prepreg Moulding  Prepreg moulding is in  many respects the next step up from hand lay up. With prepreg moulding the  resin content of the finished component can be accurately controlled, which  cannot always be said for hand lay up. Also, woven or unidirectional fibre  reinforcements are used, rather than chopped strand mat. The reason is that  they be aligned in the required orientation. However, prepreg materials are  not cheap and they usually require oven curing and vacuum bag or autoclave  moulding to take full advantage of their properties. The typical arrangement  for vacuum bag moulding is shown schematically in figure 5. Prepreg moulding  is still used extensively in the aerospace industry. It is also the method  used for the manufacture of large one off composite structures such as racing  yachts and F1 racing car monocoques.            |             |            |      Figure 5. Schematic of the vacuum bag process.       |             Materials  The prepreg plies,  containing the specified mix of resin, hardener, catalyst and reinforcing  fibres, are cut to shape. The mould is treated with release agent and can be  coated with a gel coat layer for the best surface finish. When the gel coat  is tacky and partly cured, the prepreg plies are laid down in the appropriate  orientation. With complex curves, the prepreg may not exhibit sufficient  drape; then some modification of the ply shape is required. Once the plies  are in position, for the production of a composite laminate the vacuum stack is  then put in place. For the production of a sandwich structure, a film  adhesive and the sandwich core material, which can be rigid foam or  honeycomb, can be placed on top of the laminate and the laminate as well as a  laminate core joint can be cured in one hit.   Other Components  The vacuum stack shown  in figure 5 consists of a peel ply, release film, air/resin bleed layer, and  the vacuum bag. The peel ply, frequently nylon, is removed last from the  cured laminate and provides a clean, textured surface for bonding to. The  air/resin bleed layer not only allows the vacuum to be maintained over the  laminate, but also allows for some resin to bleed out of the laminate if  necessary. Once the vacuum has been applied, the bagged component is either  put in an oven or an autoclave. Autoclave moulding essentially involves  vacuum bag moulding in a pressure cooker (with pressures up to 7 bar). As  higher pressures are attained, thicker laminates and higher fibre volume  fractions are possible.   Processing Variables  The temperature/time  cycle used to cure the laminate is critical to achieve the optimum  properties, as this will determine the resin flow and degree of cure. The  process can be semi automated by using machines to cut the prepreg tape and  robots to perform the lay up.   Resin Transfer Moulding  In the Resin Transfer  Moulding (RTM) process, a low viscosity resin is transferred into a closed  mould containing all the appropriate reinforcements and inserts as a preform.  The air is normally evacuated from the mould, allowing the use of low resin  injection pressures and epoxy moulds. Manhole covers, compressor casings, car  doors and propeller blades have all been manufactured by RTM. Ford Motor Co  recently demonstrated that the entire 90 piece front end of the Escort could be  replaced by a 2 piece RTM structure. Production cycle times were estimated to  be less than 10 minutes. The RTM structure was stiffer and stronger than the  steel structure, as well as 1/3 lighter.   Characteristics of RTM Processing  Traditionally  associated with low volume parts manufacture and low fibre contents, RTM  research has undergone significant investment in the last few years. Cycle  times of less than 3 minutes with fibre contents of over 50% by volume can  already be demonstrated. For complex or large components, a cycle time of one  to two hours is typical. Continued development is anticipated to result in a  process capable of producing small components in less than one minute, with  fibre contents approaching 60% by volume.   RTM Developments  Resin suppliers are  formulating low viscosity systems dedicated to enabling faster, more  controllable mould fill. Reinforcement suppliers are constructing fabrics  with high fibre contents, formability and minimum resistance to resin flow.  Automotive components, which are more structural in nature than body panels,  such as chassis and subframe members, can be produced on modified Resin  Injection Moulding (RIM) equipment using, RTM principles. The production  volumes will be an additional bonus to complement existing advantages such as  the potential for moulded in inserts, foam cores, good quality surface finish  and tight tolerances. Moving the process into higher performance applications  involves redesigning resins to have lower viscosities to compensate for  diffusion through higher densities of fibre. The development of fabric forms  compatible with higher process speeds and injection pressures will also hold  the key to expansion and growth of RTM technology.   The aerospace industry  also has a keen interest in processing routes to compete with autoclaving,  which is normally used for very high quality, low volume components. RTM may  approach this requirement with considerable cost reductions, estimated at  40%. In response top this, autoclave technology is becoming more highly  automated and less labour intensive, with the use of prepreg cutting,  stacking and handling facilities.    |