Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Concrete Specimens

Researchers from Greece and the UK have published an article in the journal Case Studies in Construction Materials regarding the experimental use of the Ground Penetrating Radar method on six concrete samples with purposely inserted items of various types.

Study: Reliability and limitations of GPR for identifying objects embedded in concrete – Experience from the lab. Image Credit: Nopphinan/

Advancements in Materials Technology

Newer buildings are often characterized by greater reliability, efficiency, endurance, and sturdiness as a consequence of more than 100 years of continual advancement in material science, refinement of control systems, and introduction of advanced construction and operation.

Older structures, on the other hand, frequently require provisional or stretched repair, reinforcing, or reconstruction due to a combination of inadequate initial performance, degradation, aging process impact induced by environmental conditions, and the influence of inadvertent effects such as seismic events and fire hazard.

Structural Material Reinforcement Process

To develop a successful recovery strategy, it is necessary to first examine the structure's state by identifying and characterizing its parts and systems, as well as investigating the interior health of its supporting parts. Even when design possibilities and illustrations are available, they sometimes are inadequate or not exactly implemented for a myriad of purposes, including construction project margins of error and variability, unacknowledged development errors, unintended transitions of the rebars in the development phase, and particles of different materials (metal particulates, wooden, PVC) that were unintentionally integrated into concrete or that assisted design but were not eliminated or documented.

Previous Research on the Radar Approach

The radar approach has been widely used in a variety of engineering industries, including construction, bridges, and archaeology surveys. It should be highlighted, however, that the research on less stringent quality control and higher heterogeneity between design and building is sparse when compared to that on infrastructural surveys and is focused on the evaluation of the previous structure, whereas experimental investigations on lab samples are primarily focused on humidity.

What is Ground Penetrating Radar?

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), sometimes known as "geo radar" or "surface penetrating radar" in the literature, is a frequently used technology for inspecting structural members in a non-intrusive way. It works by transmitting electromagnetic radiation across a material.

The framework consisted of an antenna that serves as both a sender and a receiver, as well as a central control unit. The sensitivity to a signal is determined by two major physical attributes of the examined substance: conductivity and dielectric constant. The particular approach for application is defined by the demands of each unique scenario, and the success is dependent on local circumstances, although the GPR approach may help significantly in acquiring both qualitative and quantitative information.

Fig. 5. (a) Specimen M1/P-W-PVC, (b) 900 ??z, (c) 1600 ??z.

(a) Specimen M1/P-W-PVC, (b) 900 ΜΗz, (c) 1600 ΜΗz. Image Credit: Erato et al., Case Studies in Construction Materials

Advantages and Disadvantages of GPR

The advantages of applying the GPR method to concrete include the recognition of integrated substances with continuously varying dielectric permittivity, such as reinforcement bars, wires, pipes, and so on, as well as the sensing of intrinsic geographic areas with particular qualities, such as significant busting and humidity variants.

It also allows you to estimate the wrap thickness and width of inspected items that are only exposed from one side, given that standardization is possible.

However, there are certain limitations and disadvantages associated with the use of GPR. One of the biggest drawbacks of the GPR technology, which has received substantial critique for its prospective applicability, is the complexity in analyzing and comprehending the resultant data.

The choice of the most viable antennas, the definition of data collecting settings, and the application technique all influence data quality and comprehension. Standardization of the radar sensor before use is also necessary, and it is more difficult when a component is only available from one side and/or its minimum thicknesses cannot be guaranteed as accurate.

Fig. 17. (a) Specimen M0/R8-R16, age: (b) 7 days (c) 90 days (with automatic settings) (d) 3 years (with the settings of the seven-day-old concrete’s survey) (e) 3 years (with automatic settings).

(a) Specimen M0/R8-R16, age: (b) 7 days (c) 90 days (with automatic settings) (d) 3 years (with the settings of the seven-day-old  concrete’s survey) (e) 3 years (with automatic settings). Image Credit: Erato et al., Case Studies in Construction Materials

Research Findings

For the experiment, six similar specimens (length: 112 cm, height: 68 cm, width: 30 cm) were molded and hardened utilizing identical conditions. Two antennas of different frequencies, 1600 MHz and 900 MHz, were used. The examination of the materials revealed that the usage of high-frequency antennas allowed for a thorough examination of their interior condition.

However, in real-world constructions where concrete pieces of varying proportions coexist, a lower-frequency antenna may produce superior results. Objects implanted at a shallow depth from the examined material emit dazzling flashes that may interfere with the identification of objects placed deeper. By examining the same routes with both the conventional and cross-polarized antennae configurations, various diameter reinforcement bars can be identified, and metal items can be discriminated from non-metallic ones.

In short, the researchers have investigated laboratory implementation of GPR on concrete specimens to thoroughly understand its intricacies, paving the way for future implementations.

Further Reading

Erato et al. 2021. Reliability and limitations of GPR for identifying objects embedded in concrete – Experience from the lab. Case Studies in Construction Materials. Available at:

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Ibtisam Abbasi

Written by

Ibtisam Abbasi

Ibtisam graduated from the Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering. During his academic career, he has worked on several research projects and has successfully managed several co-curricular events such as the International World Space Week and the International Conference on Aerospace Engineering. Having won an English prose competition during his undergraduate degree, Ibtisam has always been keenly interested in research, writing, and editing. Soon after his graduation, he joined AzoNetwork as a freelancer to sharpen his skills. Ibtisam loves to travel, especially visiting the countryside. He has always been a sports fan and loves to watch tennis, soccer, and cricket. Born in Pakistan, Ibtisam one day hopes to travel all over the world.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Abbasi, Ibtisam. (2022, January 27). Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Concrete Specimens. AZoM. Retrieved on February 27, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Abbasi, Ibtisam. "Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Concrete Specimens". AZoM. 27 February 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Abbasi, Ibtisam. "Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Concrete Specimens". AZoM. (accessed February 27, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Abbasi, Ibtisam. 2022. Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Concrete Specimens. AZoM, viewed 27 February 2024,

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Azthena logo powered by Azthena AI

Your AI Assistant finding answers from trusted AZoM content

Azthena logo with the word Azthena

Your AI Powered Scientific Assistant

Hi, I'm Azthena, you can trust me to find commercial scientific answers from

A few things you need to know before we start. Please read and accept to continue.

  • Use of “Azthena” is subject to the terms and conditions of use as set out by OpenAI.
  • Content provided on any AZoNetwork sites are subject to the site Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
  • Large Language Models can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.

Great. Ask your question.

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.