Scientists 3D Print a Conductive Silicon Carbide Ceramic

A team of researchers recently published a paper in the journal Additive Manufacturing that demonstrated the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed electrically conductive silicon carbide (SiC) ceramic fabricated using the vat photopolymerization 3D printing technique to address the temperature-dependent electrical property of conventional electrically conductive ceramics (ECCs) at high temperatures. 

Study: 3D-Printed Electrically Conductive Silicon Carbide. Image Credit: Marco Fine/


Electrically conductive ceramics (ECCs) are used in several applications, such as batteries, gas sensors, fuel cells, and catalyst supports, owing to their high thermal conductivity, enhanced wear and corrosion resistance, and greater stiffness at elevated temperatures.

Although the dense structure of the ECC facilitates a higher thermal conductivity, it hinders the thermal management capability of the ceramic. Thus, an ECC typically demonstrates a temperature-dependent electrical behavior at high temperatures.

The ECC structure must be designed at several length scales, from macroscopic to nanoscopic, to develop a conductive ceramic that displays a high electrical conductivity and electrical stability at temperatures above 600 oC.

However, readily machining ceramics into complex shapes is difficult owing to their brittle nature. Additive manufacturing (AM)/3D printing is considered a suitable method to fabricate 3D-printed ECCs with customized architectures.

Currently, the research on AM of ECC is primarily focused on the use of semiconductors, such as SiC, as the input material for 3D printing and fabrication using binder jetting or direct ink writing techniques.

However, structures printed using these AM techniques demonstrate limited resolution and do not possess the electrical property required to realize practical applications, such as catalyst and microwave optics.

Among the different 3D printing techniques, the vat photopolymerization 3D printing is more suitable to print cellular- or lattice-like ceramics as it allows accurate manipulation of the printed macroscopic structures and high-resolution printing of fine features. 

The hollow ceramic structures obtained post-heat-treatment of the ceramics printed using the vat photopolymerization technique are lightweight and demonstrate a similar stiffness as solid ceramics.

Moreover, the filler material is distributed uniformly in the 3D space during the AM process due to the layer-by-layer configuration of this printing technique, which promotes electrical conductivity in the fabricated structure.

The Study

In this study, researchers used the vat photopolymerization 3D printing technique, a bottom-up additive manufacturing approach, to fabricate 3D electrically conductive SiC ceramic architectures that simultaneously possess low thermal conductivity and high electrical conductivity.

Mesoporous silica possessing nano-sized porous structures and a high specific surface area was used as the feedstock material to realize the thermal insulation characteristics effectively. Graphene, an electrically conductive filler material, was incorporated into the ceramic mix to allow the formation of an electrically conductive network in the ceramic.

Initially, poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), graphene, and 15 wt% mesoporous silica were mixed to obtain a graphene/silica mixture. 0.5 wt% phenylbis (2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide was then added to the as-prepared mixture as the ultraviolet (UV) light photoinitiator. Additionally, 0.04 wt% 2-nitrophenyl phenyl sulfide, the light absorber, was also added to facilitate high-resolution printing.

The weight ratios of the porous silica and graphene varied from 0.015 wt% to 0.1 wt%. A dispersing agent was added to the mixture by two wt% of the PEGDA to prevent solid particle sedimentation and aggregation. A sonicator was employed to mix the precursor for two hours to prepare the graphene/silica ink.

A custom-programmed slicing software was utilized to slice the 3D computer-aided design (CAD) models to mask images with 50 μm layer thickness, while a custom-programmed control software was employed to synchronize the build-platform motion and mask image projection.

Subsequently, a customized mask image projection-based vat photopolymerization printer was employed for the AM of the porous silica/graphene nanocomposites. The as-printed 3D ceramic structures were sintered using the spark plasma sintering (SPS) process.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) were used for the characterization of the sintered printed conductive ceramics. Researchers also measured the density, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivity, and evaluated the mechanical properties of the printed samples.


3D electrically conductive porous SiC ceramic samples were fabricated successfully using the vat photopolymerization printing technique.

The synthesized photosensitive ink was dark as the graphene content effectively absorbed light spanning from the visible to the near-UV region, which can adversely affect the printing quality by preventing the light from penetrating the ink during the vat photopolymerization printing.

Thus, a 1080P projector with a 385 nm UV light was used as the light source for the mask image projection-based vat photopolymerization system after measuring the absorption spectrum of the graphene/silica ink.

Although higher UV intensities cured the ink at a faster rate, the maximum single-layer curing depth observed was 0.217 mm, and no further increase in the curing depth was observed even at higher UV intensities. The vat photopolymerization printing layer thickness was set at 0.05 mm to print structures with good structural integrity.

In the graphene-silica nanocomposites, the graphene sheet was wedged into the porous silica scaffold. After pyrolysis, graphene percolated into the siloxane network and formed the robust SiC-silica matrix.

An amorphous structure was observed in the printed samples when the sintering temperature was less than 1400 °C, while β-phase SiC and silicon dioxide cristobalite were observed at 1400 °C, indicating that a portion of silicon-oxygen bonds was replaced by the silicon-carbon bonds and the porous feedstock silica was crystallized in an inert and high-temperature environment.

The carbon substances that did not form silicon-carbon bonds were percolated on the silica skeleton and created lots of pores. Additionally, new pores were formed due to the volatilization of carbonyl and methylene groups as gases. These two factors played a crucial role in limiting significant shrinkage at high temperatures. Thus, no substantial shrinkage was observed in both printed and sintered samples.

Mesoporous structures were observed in the sintered conductive ceramics, with 10-150 nm pore size. The 3D-printed conductive ceramics displayed a low thermal conductivity, ranging from 62 to 88 mW/mK. A slight increase in thermal conductivity was observed with the rising concentration of graphene due to the strong in-plane bonding of graphene.

The printed porous sample effectively insulated the heat transfer, and the sample temperature was successfully maintained at 89.2 °C, indicating its exceptional thermal performance.

0.02 wt% graphene/silica samples withstood maximum compressive stress of 46.625 MPa, while the highest compressive strain of 0.142 at failure was observed in conductive ceramics with 0.10 wt% graphene/silica nanocomposites.

SPS treated 0.10 wt% graphene/silica graphene-silica nanocomposites displayed the maximum compressive strength of 57.947 MPa, which was 96.19% higher compared to the untreated sample, indicating that the SPS treatment effectively reinforced the mechanical performance of the sample.

The electrical conductivity increased with the rising graphene concentration from 0.02 to 0.1 0 wt%, indicating the formation of conductive pathways due to graphene percolation. The highest electrical conductivity was 680 S m−1 in the printed conductive ceramics, which was substantially higher compared to conventional conductive ceramic composites due to the high specific surface area provided by the porous feedstock silica for graphene percolation.

The minimum and maximum bulk density values of the 3D-printed ceramic were 0.366 g cm-3 to 0.897 g cm-3, respectively, and the sample demonstrated an extremely lightweight structure. Moreover, the 3D-printed conductive ceramics displayed a stable electrical performance when used in an electric circuit consisting of 64 light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and a 5V DC-powered microcontroller board.

The printed ceramic maintained a constant resistivity from room temperature to 600 °C due to its good thermal management capability, indicating that the 3D-printed SiC was less prone to temperature changes. Additionally, the porous structure created a thermal barrier to maintain stable electrical conductivity and protect the conductive network.

To summarize, the findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of using the 3D-printed electrically conductive porous SiC ceramic in applications operating in high-temperature environments and effective strategies to address the temperature-dependent electrical property of conventional metallic conductors.

More from AZoM: How Does Laser Cleaning Technology Function?


Chivate, A., Khuje, S., Armstrong, J. et al. 3D-Printed Electrically Conductive Silicon Carbide. Additive Manufacturing 2022.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Samudrapom Dam

Written by

Samudrapom Dam

Samudrapom Dam is a freelance scientific and business writer based in Kolkata, India. He has been writing articles related to business and scientific topics for more than one and a half years. He has extensive experience in writing about advanced technologies, information technology, machinery, metals and metal products, clean technologies, finance and banking, automotive, household products, and the aerospace industry. He is passionate about the latest developments in advanced technologies, the ways these developments can be implemented in a real-world situation, and how these developments can positively impact common people.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dam, Samudrapom. (2022, August 26). Scientists 3D Print a Conductive Silicon Carbide Ceramic. AZoM. Retrieved on February 29, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Dam, Samudrapom. "Scientists 3D Print a Conductive Silicon Carbide Ceramic". AZoM. 29 February 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Dam, Samudrapom. "Scientists 3D Print a Conductive Silicon Carbide Ceramic". AZoM. (accessed February 29, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dam, Samudrapom. 2022. Scientists 3D Print a Conductive Silicon Carbide Ceramic. AZoM, viewed 29 February 2024,

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Azthena logo powered by Azthena AI

Your AI Assistant finding answers from trusted AZoM content

Your AI Powered Scientific Assistant

Hi, I'm Azthena, you can trust me to find commercial scientific answers from

A few things you need to know before we start. Please read and accept to continue.

  • Use of “Azthena” is subject to the terms and conditions of use as set out by OpenAI.
  • Content provided on any AZoNetwork sites are subject to the site Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
  • Large Language Models can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.

Great. Ask your question.

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.