What is the Tensile Anisotropy of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane?

In a paper recently published in the journal Additive Manufacturing, researchers explored the polymer melt-extrusion-based 3D printing (ME3DP) process and the involved temperature reduction of freshly deposited thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). They also considered the associated mechanical dependence over the development of the interface. 

Study: An insight into the tensile anisotropy of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane. Image Credit: Pixel B/Shutterstock


Due to its simplicity of usage, low cost, and suitability for various polymers, ME3DP is a frequently employed material. Mechanical anisotropy is typically achieved because the rastering structure in 3D space is not uniform, and failure of such items is initially found in interfacial regions. Therefore, the overall mechanical performance observed for 3D-printed objects is mostly determined by the interfacial layers' bonding strength and porosity. 

Additionally, the temperature observed for freshly deposited melt and the amount of time needed for reptation above the critical temperature (Tg) determine the degree of diffusion and entanglement of molecular chains throughout the bond layer. TPU and other amorphous elastomers typically have a Tg less than zero, which cannot be attained by only ambient cooling. Therefore, it is unclear at what temperature diffusion kinetics must end. The production of orthopedic devices, low-temperature isolators, shock absorbers, and other products can be potentially facilitated with 3D-printed TPU. However, thorough research is needed to understand the process-structure-property exhibited by 3D-printed TPU. 

About the Study 

In the present study, commercial TPU filaments, composed of polyester-group compounds, were produced with butane-1,4-diol and methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. The nozzle temperature was set to 245°C when the extruded molten strands were deposited. A self-edited G-code controlled the nozzle's trajectory. Then, the printed sheets were cut into tensile bars. A universal testing device was used to examine the tensile characteristics of the CM and 3D-printed samples. The mechanical strength noted for as-printed materials was assessed using a metric called the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). 

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the printed specimen's cross-sectional morphology. The team examined the crystallization morphology of printed pieces under a polarized microscope. To record the changing transient temperature observed for the deposited melt, the Tools+ program was used. Differential scanning calorimetry was utilized to analyze the thermodynamic behavior of TPU.  At room temperature, wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) confirmed the microstructure of printed samples. 


An IR camera measured the initial melt temperature at 223°C around the nozzle exit. The simulated result was similar to the behavior of previously estimated temperature attenuation. In this procedure, the substrate layer was simultaneously heated up to almost 120°C depending on conductive heat transfer. At the same time, the temperature observed for the newly deposited melt fell rapidly due to radiative and convective heat transmission. Due to the moderated reduction rate of melt temperature, it could be predicted that the deposited melt line created by a large-diameter nozzle could prove beneficial to creating a much more developed interface layer. A numerical simulation of a multi-line accumulated structure revealed that the melt lines in contact with the newly deposited line showed the greatest healing. In contrast, the alternated lines showed less damage. 

The sample produced at a higher bed temperature (Tb) of electric heating had a smooth surface. The sample maintained its intended shape after cooling and finishing the printing process. Up until the Tb reached 160°C, the findings demonstrated mechanical anisotropy. As Tb rose, the tensile strain at break across the transverse direction increased. However, the strain at break for longitudinal tensile testing remained steady. The interfaces created by a pair of melt lines that were not parallel to the direction of the load were primarily responsible for the observed tensile anisotropy. 

The team noted that raising Tb significantly made it easier to lower the porosity of the printed samples. In contrast, higher Tb encouraged soft segment crystallization dynamics and produced many crystallites, resulting in a more striking phase separation. When adequate crystallization time was given, it was inferred that the considerable elevation in yield stress exhibited by the samples that were printed at Tb =100-140°C, comprising both transverse and longitudinal yield stress, should be due to this crystallization behavior. Therefore, the two main factors contributing to the improved tensile characteristics and tensile isotropy were the enhanced crystallization kinetics and the highly reduced porosity. 


In conclusion, engineering applications can use the present technology to convert 3D-printed items into a one-step manufacturing process. According to the simulation results, the melt's heat only affected the layers immediately surrounding it, while it had little effect on the layers farther away. Tensile characteristics changed from anisotropy to isotropy when Tb rose from 25°C to 160°C. 

The weak orientation degree associated with molecular chains on the deposited molten filament surface could be eliminated by raising Tb under a long residence time. Overall, this work offers a simple method to print high-strength parts while highlighting the mechanical anisotropy of printed TPU. According to the authors, a printer having ambient heat sources and a separate cooling system can be developed in the future. This will help to transcend the current limitations and flaws in ME3DP technology. 


Xiang Lin, et al., (2022). An insight into the tensile anisotropy of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane. Additive Manufacturingdoi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103260 

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Chinmay Chari

Written by

Chinmay Chari

Chinmay Chari is a technical writer based in Goa, India. His academic background is in Earth Sciences and he holds a Master's degree in Applied Geology from Goa University. His academic research involved the petrological studies of Mesoarchean komatiites in the Banasandra Greenstone belt in Karnataka, India. He has also had exposure to geological fieldwork in Dharwad, Vadodara, in India, as well as the coastal and western ghat regions of Goa, India. As part of an internship, he has been trained in geological mapping and assessment of the Cudnem mine, mapping of a virgin area for mineral exploration, as well understanding the beneficiation and shipping processes of iron ore.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chari, Chinmay. (2022, November 28). What is the Tensile Anisotropy of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane?. AZoM. Retrieved on July 25, 2024 from https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=60457.

  • MLA

    Chari, Chinmay. "What is the Tensile Anisotropy of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane?". AZoM. 25 July 2024. <https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=60457>.

  • Chicago

    Chari, Chinmay. "What is the Tensile Anisotropy of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane?". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=60457. (accessed July 25, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Chari, Chinmay. 2022. What is the Tensile Anisotropy of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane?. AZoM, viewed 25 July 2024, https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=60457.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.