By Owais AliReviewed by Lexie CornerJun 3 2025Atmospheric CO₂ levels have increased as a result of anthropogenic activities. This rise has contributed to global warming, ocean acidification, and the degradation of ecosystems. Addressing this excess CO₂ has become a critical scientific and technological challenge.
Catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ has emerged as a promising approach to transform this greenhouse gas into valuable chemicals and fuels, such as methanol, methane, and liquefied petroleum gas.
Image Credit: Quality Stock Arts/Shutterstock.com
CO2 hydrogenation not only contributes to carbon mitigation but also provides a sustainable route for producing essential hydrocarbons, thereby supporting the transition toward a circular carbon economy.
However, the efficiency and selectivity of this approach rely heavily on catalysts that can effectively activate and convert CO₂ under economically viable conditions.1
Role of Catalysts in CO₂ Hydrogenation
CO₂ is thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert due to its strong C=O double bonds, requiring high activation energy (200–300 kJ/mol) to be hydrogenated into value-added chemicals. This process demands extremely high temperatures and pressures, which are economically and energetically impractical for industrial applications.
Catalysts provide alternative reaction pathways and stabilize key intermediates, reducing the activation energy by 50–100 kJ/mol. They enhance the adsorption and activation of CO₂ and H₂ molecules on their surfaces, enabling bond cleavage and formation at significantly reduced temperatures and pressures. As a result, the reaction can proceed efficiently under practical conditions, typically at temperatures of 200–400°C and a pressure of 20-50 bar.
In addition to improving reaction rates, catalysts also influence product selectivity by stabilizing specific intermediates and directing the reaction toward desired products. For example, copper-based catalysts promote methanol formation through the stabilization of formate intermediates, while iron-cobalt systems favor hydrocarbon production via Fischer-Tropsch mechanisms.2,3
Download your PDF copy now!
Catalyst Materials used in CO2 Hydrogenation
Single Catalytic Materials
Single-component catalysts (SCMs) consist of a homogeneous material that directly drives a chemical reaction without requiring additional promoters, supports, or composite elements. SCMs are primarily categorized into two groups: transition metal carbides (TMCs) and reducible metal oxides (RMOs).
Transition metal carbides, such as molybdenum carbide (MoC), exhibit methanol formation activity under oxidant-free synthesis conditions. Their distinct electronic structure enables the effective activation of reactants and facilitates various catalytic processes.
However, TMCs demonstrate limited methanol selectivity and suffer from poor long-term stability due to oxidation by CO₂ and H₂O, which leads to deactivation through the transformation of the carbide phase into less active oxides.
In contrast, reducible metal oxides like indium oxide (In₂O₃) offer higher methanol selectivity and catalytic performance, attributed to the presence of abundant surface oxygen vacancies. These vacancies enhance CO₂ activation and stabilize formate intermediates while participating in regenerative cycles where methanol formation replenishes vacancies, and H₂ aids their regeneration.
Binary Catalytic Materials
Binary catalytic materials enhance CO₂ hydrogenation by combining active phases with specific promoters or supports, creating synergistic effects that overcome the limitations of single-component catalysts.
For example, ZnZrOₓ prepared via flame spray pyrolysis achieves high surface area and optimal zinc dispersion, forming active Zn–VO–Zr ensembles that facilitate methanol formation through the formate pathway. This precise structural integration enhances catalytic activity and stability by promoting reactant activation and intermediate stabilization.
Binary catalytic materials also provide a versatile platform where deliberate interactions between phases yield catalytic architectures with superior performance compared to their components.
Ternary Catalytic Materials
Ternary catalytic materials integrate active phases, promoters, and supports that synergistically improve CO₂ hydrogenation.
The extensively studied Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ system exemplifies this approach, where copper nanoparticles serve as the primary active sites and zinc oxide enhances copper dispersion. It stabilizes Cu⁺ species, and alumina provides structural support by increasing surface area and catalyst durability.
This configuration enables enhanced catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability, making the Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ system a benchmark catalyst for efficient methanol synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation under industrially relevant conditions.4
Zeolite-Based Catalysts
Zeolite-based catalysts are important in CO₂ hydrogenation to gasoline-range hydrocarbons because they have adjustable pore sizes and strong acidity. These properties allow for precise control over product selectivity, particularly favoring branched hydrocarbons such as isoalkanes.
When combined with metal oxides or multi-metallic systems, zeolites improve CO₂ adsorption and activation, thereby enhancing catalytic efficiency.
The zeolite framework also stabilizes key reaction intermediates, including formate and methoxy species, which support the hydrogenation pathway toward hydrocarbon synthesis.
Recent developments include TPABr-treated Fe-Zn-Zr oxides supported on HZSM-5, which demonstrate enhanced CO₂ adsorption and activation owing to increased oxygen vacancy concentrations. This catalyst system achieved 18 % CO₂ conversion with a notably high C₅+ isoalkane selectivity of 93 %, attributed to the improved formation of formate and methoxy intermediates.3
Noble Metal Catalysts
Noble metal catalysts, such as ruthenium, palladium, and platinum, exhibit high activity and selectivity in CO₂ hydrogenation. They efficiently convert CO₂ into value-added products like methanol and methane under relatively mild conditions.
Their strong performance is attributed to electronic configurations that promote CO₂ adsorption and activation by weakening C=O bonds. These metals also offer excellent thermal and chemical stability, enabling sustained operation in long-term processes. However, their high cost limits large-scale industrial use.
Bimetallic Catalysts
Bimetallic catalysts combine the properties of two different metals, resulting in improved activity, selectivity, and stability compared to single-metal systems. For example, Pd–Zn catalysts enhance methanol synthesis through the formation of β-PdZn alloy nanoparticles. Pd–Cu systems can also achieve higher selectivity when the metal ratios are optimized.
These improvements are due to synergistic interactions between the two metals, which enhance adsorption behavior and help stabilize active sites under reaction conditions.5
Performance Comparison in CO₂ Hydrogenation Applications
| Catalyst Type |
Composition & Structure |
Key Features |
Advantages |
Limitations |
Typical Products & Selectivity |
Industrial Relevance |
| Single-Component |
Transition metal carbides (e.g., MoC), reducible metal oxides (e.g., In2O3) |
Homogeneous materials, simple structure |
Direct reaction pathway; surface oxygen vacancies (RMOs) improve selectivity |
TMCs are prone to oxidation and deactivation; limited methanol selectivity |
Methanol (RMOs favored), moderate selectivity |
Limited by stability issues, mainly at the lab scale |
| Binary Catalysts |
Active phase + promoter/support (e.g., ZnZrOx) |
Synergistic phase interactions |
Enhanced activity, stability, and intermediate stabilization |
More complex synthesis; performance depends on precise phase integration |
Methanol via formate pathway with improved selectivity |
Increased interest due to better performance |
| Ternary Catalysts |
Active metal + promoter + support (e.g., Cu–ZnO–Al2O3) |
Multi-phase synergy; optimized dispersion |
High catalytic activity, selectivity, and durability |
Complexity in formulation and optimization |
Methanol with industrially relevant conversion and selectivity |
Benchmark catalysts for industrial methanol synthesis |
| Zeolite-Based |
Zeolites with metal oxides or multi-metallics (e.g., TPABr-treated Fe–Zn–Zr/HZSM-5) |
Tunable pore structures; strong acidity |
Precise control over product selectivity; stable intermediates |
Requires careful design to balance activity and selectivity |
Gasoline-range hydrocarbons, high isoalkane selectivity (up to 93 %) |
Emerging for hydrocarbon synthesis beyond methanol |
| Noble Metal |
Ruthenium, palladium, platinum |
Favorable electronic configurations; strong stability |
High activity and selectivity at mild conditions; long-term stability |
High cost limits large-scale use |
Methanol and methane |
Limited by cost; research focuses on cost reduction |
| Bimetallic Catalysts |
Alloyed metals (e.g., Pd–Zn, Pd–Cu) |
Synergistic metal interactions |
Improved activity, selectivity, and site stability compared to monometallic |
Requires precise atomic ratio control |
Methanol with enhanced selectivity and efficiency |
Promising for reducing noble metal content |
Current Research Challenges and Developments
Selective CO₂ Hydrogenation to Methanol
The hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol faces significant challenges, primarily due to limited selectivity and catalyst deactivation. Conventional CuZnO catalysts typically exhibit methanol selectivity below 60 % under optimal conditions, with competing reactions such as the reverse water-gas shift reducing methanol yield and generating undesired byproducts.
A recent study introduced a Cd cluster-supported TiO₂ catalyst (Cd/TiO₂) that significantly enhances performance, achieving 81 % methanol selectivity at 15.8 % CO₂ conversion under 5 MPa, with methane formation below 0.7 %.
The researchers attributed this enhanced catalytic performance to the presence of sub-nanometer Cd clusters and isolated Cd sites on the TiO₂ support, which facilitate the formate intermediate pathway at the Cd–TiO₂ interface.
Computational analysis further showed that this reaction pathway has lower energy barriers compared to those in bulk CdTiO₃ phases, thereby enhancing methanol selectivity and suppressing undesired side reactions.6
For a real-world example of catalyst innovation in methanol production from CO₂, see this short video on a novel indium oxide-based system currently being scaled up for industrial use:
Sustainable methanol production from carbon dioxide
Graphene-Fenced Fe-Co Catalysts for Tunable CO₂ Hydrogenation
Another challenge in CO₂ hydrogenation is achieving precise control over product selectivity, due to the complex interplay between chain propagation and hydrogenation reactions. Conventional catalysts often lack the ability to selectively produce desired products without generating unwanted byproducts.
A recent study introduced a graphene fencing strategy to spatially modulate bimetallic Fe–Co catalysts by constructing graphene barriers that regulate the distribution and interaction of active sites. The researchers demonstrated that positioning Fe–Co sites on the surface of the graphene fences promoted light olefin production with 50.1 % selectivity.
In contrast, spatially isolating Fe–Co nanoparticles within the graphene barriers shifted the product distribution toward liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), with 43.6 % selectivity. This spatial configuration stabilized iron carbides and metallic cobalt in separate forms, allowing for selective control over C–C coupling and the secondary hydrogenation of olefins.
This approach facilitates direct CO₂ hydrogenation to LPG via the Fischer–Tropsch pathway, achieving the highest reported space-time yields among similar catalytic systems.7
Scaling CO₂ Solutions Through Catalyst Innovation
CO₂ hydrogenation presents a promising route for both reducing greenhouse gas emissions and generating valuable chemical products, including fuels that support Power-to-Liquid Sustainable Aviation (PLSA) and other circular carbon technologies.
Advances in catalyst design, such as tailoring active site environments, engineering catalyst structures, and refining synthesis methods, are central to improving reaction efficiency, selectivity, and scalability.
These efforts are crucial to enhancing the efficiency and scalability of CO₂ hydrogenation, thereby facilitating its practical application in industrial settings.
Explore more on catalyst innovation:
References and Further Reading
- Yang, Z., Guo, D., Dong, S., Wu, J., Zhu, M., Han, Y., Liu, Z. (2023). Catalysis for CO2 Hydrogenation—What We Have Learned/Should Learn from the Hydrogenation of Syngas to Methanol. Catalysts, 13(11), 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13111452
- Ronda-Lloret, M., Wang, Y., Oulego, P., Rothenberg, G., Tu, X., Shiju, N. R. (2020). CO2 Hydrogenation at Atmospheric Pressure and Low Temperature Using Plasma-Enhanced Catalysis over Supported Cobalt Oxide Catalysts. ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 8(47), 17397–17407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05565
- Cui, L., Liu, C., Yao, B., Edwards, P. P., Xiao, T., Cao, F. (2022). A review of catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide: From waste to hydrocarbons. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, 1037997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1037997
- Araújo, T. P., Mitchell, S., Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2024). Design Principles of Catalytic Materials for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Advanced Materials, 36(48), 2409322. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202409322
- Ye, J., Dimitratos, N., Rossi, L. M., Thonemann, N., Beale, A. M., Wojcieszak, R. (2025). Hydrogenation of CO2 for sustainable fuel and chemical production. Science, 387(6737), eadn9388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn9388
- Wang, J., Meeprasert, J., Han, Z., Wang, H., Feng, Z., Tang, C., Sha, F., Tang, S., Li, G., Pidko, E. A., Li, C. (2022). Highly dispersed Cd cluster supported on TiO2 as an efficient catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 43(3), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63907-4
- Liang, J., Liu, J., Guo, L., Wang, W., Wang, C., Gao, W., Guo, X., He, Y., Yang, G., Yasuda, S., Liang, B., Tsubaki, N. (2024). CO2 hydrogenation over Fe-Co bimetallic catalysts with tunable selectivity through a graphene fencing approach. Nature Communications, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44763-9
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.