How Does Pitch Coating Change the Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries?

In a paper recently published in the open-access journal Materials, researchers assessed the impact of pitch coating on anode materials in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). They also explored the mechanisms through which pitch coating enhances the electrochemical characteristics. It was determined that the performance rate of the battery improved with the addition of pitch to the flake graphite (FG), while the pitch amount in excess hampered the performance rate.

Study: Effect and Mechanism of Pitch Coating on the Rate Performance Improvement of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Image Credit: asharkyu/


The production of electric vehicles (EVs) is on the rise in an attempt to curb the dependency on fossil fuels that contribute to an increase in carbon emissions and thereby global warming and pollution. Hence, developing batteries, especially LIBs, has become crucial.

Graphite, with its short reduction voltage yielding excellent cyclability, is commonly the anode material used in LIBs. However, the power density for modern batteries is insufficient due to the limited passageway of lithium ions. Methods to improve the graphite anode’s performance rates include surface doping, carbon coating, and graphite spheronization.

Pitch is a residue that is a result of heat treatment and subsequent distillation of coal tar or petroleum fractions. It consists largely of aromatic hydrocarbons and is solid at room temperature but has a wide softening range rather than a definite melting temperature. Additionally, pitch coatings are advantageous in imparting adequate mechanical strength to regulate high conductivity and volumetric expansion, while being cost-effective. Therefore, they have gained attention as a source of carbon coating.

About the Study

In the present study, the team prepared samples of pitch-coated graphite from natural FG and pitch, which were blended in weight ratios of 80:20, 85:15, 90:10, and 95:5 for 30 minutes through centrifugal mixing. Characterization of the samples was carried out for true density, which was computed by a He pycnometer. Surface crystallinity was measured using Raman spectroscopy, and particle morphology and size distribution were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser diffraction, respectively. Other parameters like powder resistivity, packing density, and powder conductivity were also determined.


SEM images of FG, CFG5, CFG10, CFG15, and CFG20. Image Credit: Kim, B et al., Materials

To assess the electrochemical attributes, electrodes were made using styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) as binders. The electrolyte selected was 1 M LiPF6 dispersed in a 1:1 by volume mixture of diethyl carbonate (DEC) and ethylene carbonate (EC), separated by polyethylene (PE). Electrochemical parameters such as the galvanostatic discharge and charge were tested in between a potential of 0.01-1.5V. The performance rate was calculated by lithiating the coin cells at a rate of 0.1C and then delithiating at different rates in the range of 0.1C to 5C. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out at a 10 mV amplitude with a frequency ranging from 100 kHz-0.01 Hz. The diffusion coefficient was assessed via cyclic voltammetry (CV) ranging from 0.01-1.5V.


The observations showed that 5 wt% pitch coating on FG resulted in a more uniform surface and improved spheroidization as compared to FG without pitch coating, thus enabling a lithium-ion diffusion pathway. Furthermore, pronounced aggregation was observed with rising pitch content, resulting in a rougher particle surface. The particle size distribution exhibited a rapid increase from 15 wt% pitch because of pitch aggregation. However, a substantial reduction in the specific surface area of the pitch-coated samples resulted in a smooth and clean surface.

The first initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) was observed to be higher with 5 wt% pitch coating (84.07%), as compared to that of FG (80.49%). On the other hand, pitch content higher than 5 wt% exhibited lower ICE values than that of FG. In comparison to FG, the discharge capacity retention of FG with 5 wt% pitch coating was 1.9 and 8.8 times higher at 2 C and 5 C whereas higher pitch content exhibited lower capacity retention values. The cycling stability deteriorated with the formation of a graphene layer due to lithium intercalation and deintercalation. The graphene layer formation was inhibited with the addition of pitch.


In summary, the results showed that a uniform pitch coating makes the graphite particles more spherical, improving the ICE. However, at 10 wt% and higher, pitch aggregation occurred resulting in a non-uniform surface. The enhancement in retention capacity could be attributed to the amorphous structure of the carbon pitch providing a lithium-ion pathway thereby improving the rate of performance.

Likewise, the rolling process orients the graphite particles parallel to the copper current collector. The diffusion pathway is extended since the graphite particles are oriented perpendicular to the diffusion direction, thus making the diffusion of lithium ions difficult. A uniformly coated pitch imparts a spherical shape, inhibits particle orientation while rolling, and results in a higher rate of performance. 

References and Further Reading 

Kim, B.-R.; Kim, J.-H.; Im, J.-S. Effect and Mechanism of Pitch Coating on the Rate Performance Improvement of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2022, 15, 4713.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Chinmay Chari

Written by

Chinmay Chari

Chinmay Chari is a technical writer based in Goa, India. His academic background is in Earth Sciences and he holds a Master's degree in Applied Geology from Goa University. His academic research involved the petrological studies of Mesoarchean komatiites in the Banasandra Greenstone belt in Karnataka, India. He has also had exposure to geological fieldwork in Dharwad, Vadodara, in India, as well as the coastal and western ghat regions of Goa, India. As part of an internship, he has been trained in geological mapping and assessment of the Cudnem mine, mapping of a virgin area for mineral exploration, as well understanding the beneficiation and shipping processes of iron ore.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chari, Chinmay. (2022, July 26). How Does Pitch Coating Change the Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries?. AZoM. Retrieved on August 16, 2022 from

  • MLA

    Chari, Chinmay. "How Does Pitch Coating Change the Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries?". AZoM. 16 August 2022. <>.

  • Chicago

    Chari, Chinmay. "How Does Pitch Coating Change the Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries?". AZoM. (accessed August 16, 2022).

  • Harvard

    Chari, Chinmay. 2022. How Does Pitch Coating Change the Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries?. AZoM, viewed 16 August 2022,

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type