Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics

A recent article published in the Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing detailed the synthesis of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 composites using the fused granules fabrication (FGF) method.

Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics

Image Credit: Yalcin Sonat/Shutterstock.com

Background

Ceramic composites offer excellent high-temperature stability, low thermal expansion coefficients, high hardness, wear resistance, and other properties.

Among these, TiC-based ceramics are prominent in industries such as aviation and space due to their high-temperature structural properties. Alternatively, SiC-based ceramics are used as high-temperature heating elements and in tribological applications. Additionally, porous SiC- and TiC-based materials are useful for filtration, separation, catalytic reactions, and hydrogen storage.

With their unique combination of metal and ceramic properties, MAX phases are often added to ceramic composites to enhance high-temperature stability. These phases, represented by the formula Mn+1AXn (where M is an early transition metal, A is a group element, and X is C/N), include ternary carbides and nitrides.

This study investigated SiC-Ti3AlC2 (TAC:SiC) and TiC-Ti3AlC2 (TAC:TiC) composites produced by the FGF method, a material extrusion additive manufacturing (MEAM) technology used to obtain high-quality samples from ceramic materials.

Methods

For fabricating the ceramic composites, mixtures of TAC:SiC and TAC:TiC powders were used in different volume ratios (70:30, 50:50, 30:70). These powders were mixed by a dry method to prepare feedstock for FGF and spark plasma sintering (SPS). Additionally, MC2162 polymer binder (a mix of polyester and polyamide with a mass ratio of 1:5) was used to prepare the feedstock.

The premixed material was extruded in a single-screw extruder at 145 °C to obtain a homogeneous feedstock. The feedstock's rheological properties were characterized using a plastometer and capillary rheometer to determine the melt flow index and viscometry.

Bulk ceramic samples were produced using both FGF and SPS methods for comparison. The FGF process employed a three-dimensional (3D) printer with a custom screw-based pellet-fed printing head to produce bulk samples of size 20×5×5 mm3, followed by sintering.

The 3D printing parameters, such as extrusion coefficient and de-binding speed, were thoroughly optimized. Alternatively, SPS was performed for five minutes at 1200, 1250, and 1300 °C at 50 MPa to produce cylindrical samples of six grams each.

All ceramic samples were studied using optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additionally, their phase composition was determined using an X-Ray diffractometer (XRD). The three-point bending test and microhardness measurements (Vickers method) were performed to examine the mechanical properties of the fabricated ceramic composites.

Results and Discussion

Optimization of the additive formation parameters resulted in the successful synthesis of ceramic composites. SEM images revealed no macro-defects or cracks in FGF samples, indicating proper printing modes and de-binding processes.

Micron SiC particles with submicron TiC satellites and micron TAC particles represent the overall microstructure of the composites. While the SiC particles form the main skeleton, TAC and its decomposition products were positioned along the boundaries of the skeleton particles, thereby increasing the composite’s strength.

Submicron-sized elements were observed in FGF TiC:TAC samples after sintering.

Submicron pores were also visible on the fracture and cross-section. Sintering decomposed TAC into TiC and Al while releasing tin, which acted as an additive suppressing the growth of the Ti2AlC phase during Ti3AlC2 synthesis. Thus, the TiC:TAC structure mainly comprised TiC and preserved particles of the MAX phase.

Alternatively, the SPS samples retained a greater MAX phase, as evidenced by their fracture surfaces. These samples also exhibited a high density compared to the porous structure of FGF samples.

For samples with the same composition of SiC:TAC (70:30) sintered at 1300 °C, the hardness of the SPS samples was 290 ± 15 HV(0.5/10), while that of the FGF samples was 89 ± 5 HV(0.5/10). The porosity and phase composition of the samples were responsible for this difference in hardness.

The sintering temperature was observed to significantly influence the composite strength, greater than the porosity. Thus, TAC in this study could be considered an additional factor in adjusting the porosity in addition to the main factors of sintering temperature and polymer content in the feedstock.

Conclusion

The study examined ceramic composites with various component ratios and powder/polymer compositions. By optimizing FGF parameters, the researchers successfully synthesized TiC and SiC composites without macroscopic defects.

The optimal de-binding time for samples with a 5×55×5 mm cross-section was 84 hours, sufficient to remove 99 % polymer. The best mechanical properties were achieved at a sintering temperature of 1300 °C for both TiC and SiC composites.

Key parameters regulating porosity in FGF samples included TAC content, sintering temperature, and polymer content.

Journal Reference

Krinitcyn, M., Kopytov, G., Ryumin, E. (2024). Additive Manufacturing of Ti3AlC2/TiC and Ti3AlC2/SiC Ceramics Using the Fused Granules Fabrication Technique. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8030123

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2024, June 21). Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics. AZoM. Retrieved on October 13, 2024 from https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=63233.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics". AZoM. 13 October 2024. <https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=63233>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=63233. (accessed October 13, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2024. Additive Manufacturing of SiC-Ti3AlC2 and TiC-Ti3AlC2 Ceramics. AZoM, viewed 13 October 2024, https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=63233.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.