The development of advanced materials is shifting from intuition and slow trial-and-error to something much more data-aware. Instead of starting with a rough idea and a beaker, materials scientists can now lean on materials informatics to search, sort, and design candidates with far more speed and confidence.
Image Credit: tsyhun/Shutterstock.com
What is Materials Informatics?
Materials informatics sits at the intersection of experimental science, computation, and data analytics. The aim is simple: use data and models to make discovering, designing, and deploying new materials faster and less painful.
Traditionally, developments in materials science have been steady but slow. Scientists have relied on experimental, theoretical, and computational methods, which have enabled progress – albeit slow and resource-intensive – from discovery to deployment. But these methods have frequently extended development cycles and sometimes diminished the proprietary value of new materials by the time they reach the market.
The rise of data science and AI has changed the way that process is approached. Rather than trawling through limited datasets or relying purely on experience, researchers can now use algorithms to uncover correlations, explore huge design spaces, and automate the tedious parts of property prediction.
Materials informatics has built on this transformation by integrating extensive experimental datasets with simulation, high-throughput screening, and machine learning models that identify subtle trends and propose optimized material candidates.
In practice, this integrated approach helps shorten development cycles, cut costs, and make it easier to react to changing technical, regulatory, and supply-chain pressures. It also supports wider goals, such as moving more quickly toward sustainable, high-performance materials that can stand up to real-world use.1,2
Get all the details: Grab your PDF here!
How are Materials Informatics and Advanced Data Analytics influencing Engineering?
In engineering, materials informatics isn't about replacing existing methods, but instead about speeding them up and stitching them together. Data-driven tools are changing the way we discover, understand, and design materials, and where they sit in the broader design workflow.
Reshaping Materials Discovery
Large experimental datasets, high-throughput simulations, and machine learning models now make it possible to predict material properties and screen candidates before a single lab batch is made. Engineers can filter millions of possibilities down to a shortlist of promising compounds, well before they commit resources to synthesis and testing.
This has already led to the development of OLED molecules, Heusler structures, polymer dielectrics, metallic glasses, shape memory alloys, and high-entropy alloys.
When suitable candidates can't be found in existing datasets, inverse design techniques using neural networks, latent-space optimization, and spectroscopy-based mapping provide pathways for generating novel materials, expanding the scope of discovery even further.
Advancing Materials Selection and Understanding
Materials informatics also helps with a less obvious but equally important job: understanding why a material behaves the way it does.
Using methods such as compressed sensing and unsupervised learning, researchers can pull out key descriptors from high-dimensional datasets and link them to performance. That makes it easier to choose materials based on stability, catalytic activity, superconductivity, phase behavior, or other critical metrics – with a clearer view of the trade-offs.
For engineering teams, this means that material decisions can be optimized for both raw performance as well as reliability, manufacturability, and long-term behavior in realistic conditions.
Transforming Materials Design and Modelling
Materials informatics can further improve engineering design workflows by integrating surrogate models and machine-learned interatomic potentials that reproduce first-principles accuracy at significantly lower computational cost.
These models support studies in predictive simulations and chemical reaction modeling, among others, enabling engineers to evaluate materials under realistic operating conditions, simulate large-scale systems, and optimize designs previously inaccessible to conventional computational methods.
By incorporating AI-driven models into established simulation software, materials informatics allows scientists to make rapid iterations, informed decision-making, and design high-performance materials across diverse engineering sectors.1,2,3
Real-Life Applications of Materials Informatics and Advanced Data Analytics
Image Credit: SeaRick1/Shutterstock.com
3D-Printable Aerospace-Grade Alloy Development
Designing high-strength, 3D-printable aluminum alloys for aerospace is notoriously difficult. Alloys need to be lightweight and withstand high temperatures, all while avoiding issues like hot cracking during printing.
HRL Laboratories worked with Citrine’s materials informatics platform to tackle this problem. With the program, they rapidly screened 11.5 million powder and nanoparticle combinations, identifying 100 candidates and producing the AL 7A77 alloy.
This alloy became the first high-strength aluminum powder for off-the-shelf additive manufacturing, with NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center as its first customer.
This approach was able to cut years of experimental development to days, demonstrating the power of advanced data analytics in industrial material design.4
LangSim: Reliable Atomistic Simulations
Atomistic simulations often require extensive computational resources and expertise, and conventional LLMs cannot reliably perform complex simulations or inverse design.
LangSim, developed at the Max-Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials, takes a different approach. It couples large language models with domain-specific agents that manage atomistic simulations. The system can, for example, predict properties such as bulk modulus or help search for optimized alloy compositions.
By combining AI and computational workflows, LangSim enhances simulation reliability and enables dynamic materials design beyond static datasets.5
AlphaMat: Accelerating Material Modeling
A recent study published in Npj Computational Materials introduced AlphaMat, an AI-driven platform that addresses this challenge by providing 90+ integrated functions for data collection, preprocessing, feature engineering, model development, parameter optimization, and result analysis.
Using property databases covering 19,488 materials, AlphaMat has already supported the rapid design of photovoltaic materials, metallic electrodes, solid-state electrolytes, and thermal-conductivity materials.
It cuts both experimental and computational overhead, and its interface is designed so that researchers can explore models and design materials without needing to write code.6
Hybrid Perovskite Phase Analysis
Hybrid perovskites such as methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) are promising for optoelectronic applications but structurally complex. Exploring all possible phases and configurations with conventional techniques, like much of material design, is a slow, difficult task.
A study published in Materials Advances applied neural-network potentials combined with Monte Carlo Funnel Hopping to rapidly explore the energy landscape of MaPbI3.
This use of materials informatics accelerated the identification and analysis of non-perovskite phases, showing just how far machine learning can help in the understanding of structurally and compositionally complex materials.7
Challenges to Cover Before Widespread Material Informatics Success
For all its promise, materials informatics still faces some substantial hurdles.
High-quality, consistent datasets are essential for accurate predictions, yet many materials systems lack sufficient experimental or computational data, limiting model reliability.
In addition, current inverse design approaches frequently generate theoretically optimal candidates that are difficult or even impossible to synthesize, creating a gap between computational predictions and experimental feasibility.
On top of this, machine learning models can act as “black boxes”. This means they can cause unnecessary complications in translating predictions into actionable engineering decisions, while providing little to no physical insight.
Finally, navigating high-dimensional, multi-objective design spaces, where materials must meet competing performance, stability, and manufacturability requirements, remains computationally intensive, requiring careful balance between efficiency and accuracy.1,2
Conclusion
Despite these challenges, materials informatics is redefining the development of new materials and chemicals. Rather than replacing established methods, it weaves data-driven tools into the existing research and development fabric.
By using advanced analytics and AI-enabled materials data infrastructure, materials informatics turbocharges decision-making, enabling researchers and industries to meet market demands more quickly and with greater precision.
Saving this article for later? Grab a PDF here!
References and Further Reading
- Zivic, F., Malisic, A. K., Grujovic, N., Stojanovic, B., & Ivanovic, M. (2025). Materials informatics: A review of AI and machine learning tools, platforms, data repositories, and applications to architectured porous materials. Materials Today Communications, 48, 113525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113525
- Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S., & Rinke, P. (2019). Data-Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Advanced Science, 6(21), 1900808. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900808
- Rajan, K., Behler, J., & Pickard, C. J. (2023). Introduction to Materials Informatics. Materials Advances, 4(13), 2695–2697. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ma90047a
- Citrine. (2025). First to Market - 3D Printable Aerospace-Grade Alloy Development Reduced From Years to Days. https://citrine.io/first-to-market-high-strength-3d-printable-aluminum-alloy/
- Dr. Jan Janssen. (2024). LangSim – Large Language Model Interface for Atomistic Simulation. https://www.mpie.de/5063016/LangSim
- Wang, Z., Chen, A., Tao, K., Cai, J., Han, Y., Gao, J., Ye, S., Wang, S., Ali, I., & Li, J. (2023). AlphaMat: A material informatics hub connecting data, features, models and applications. Npj Computational Materials, 9(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01086-5
- Finkler, J. A., & Goedecker, S. (2022). Experimental absence of the non-perovskite ground state phases of MaPbI3 explained by a Funnel Hopping Monte Carlo study based on a neural network potential. Materials Advances, 4(1), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00958g
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.